Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

11-3   		OPP		104,343			Holmquist v.
		(SJ)		104,344 		Synergy	Re-
   							habilitation,
							Inc.

11-3   		EX   		75/186,844   		ZD Inc.      
  
11-3   		OPP		99,676			Food-Tek, Inc. v.
		CANC		24,523 			Rhodia, Inc.   
   
				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(d)   		Opposition	"SYNERGY PHYSICAL	"SYNERGY.
		Sustained	THERAPY"		WORKING TOGETHER
		(in both 	[physical therapy 	WORKS" and
		cases)		services]   		"SYNERGY
		[Opposer's 				REHABILITATION,
		motion for 				INC."
		summary judg-				(and design)
		ment granted 				[both marks for 
		in both 				physical, occu-
		cases]   				pational and 
							speech therapy]
		
2(e)(1)      	Refusal					"PC SHOPPER"
		Affirmed				[providing 
      							multiple-user
							access to a global
							computer informa-
							tion network 
							featuring news and
							information about
							computers, com-
							puting, systems, 
							technology and
							information net-
							works; providing 
							on-line informa-
							tion about com-
							puters, computing,
							systems, tech-
							nology and infor-
							mation networks 
							via a global 
							computer
							network]

2(d)   		Oppositon	"FOOD-TEK"		"YOUR FOOD TECH
		Dismissed;	(used as a trade 	PARTNER"
		Petition to 	name) [consulting 	(in stylized 
		Cancel Denied	services in the		lettering) and 
   				field of food 		"YOUR FOOD TECH 
				manufacturing and 	PARTNER"
				food product 		[both marks for 
				research and 		providing informa-
				development]   		tion regarding 
							food ingredient 
							use]      

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

						No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
