Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

10-19   	OPP   		103,832   		Maylon E. Dickey
							v. Metro 
							Industries

10-20      	OPP		101,650   		Nabisco, Inc. v.
		(R) 					Sathers Inc.   
  
				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(d)   		Opposition	"E.C.O."		"E.C.G.
		Sustained  	[chemical-free 		ENVIRONMENTAL
 				absorbent granular	CLEANING
				mixture of baked	GRANULES"
				clay and silicon 	(in stylized 
				sand for use by 	lettering)
				home owners, com-	[cleaning prepara-
				mercial business	tions, namely, 
				establishments, 	chemical free
				highway depart-		granular absorbent
				ments and fire		material of baked 
				departments in 		clay for use with 
				cleaning oil and 	patented cleaning 
				grease spills on 	equipment for
				asphalt and con-	absorption of 
				crete surfaces]   	liquid substances 
							to include, but
							not limited to, 
							oils, grease, 
							transmission 
							fluid, hydraulic 
							fluid and
							anti-freeze]

2(e)(1);      	Request for				"TANGY FRUITS"
genericness;	Reconsidera-				[candy]      
whether		tion Denied
applicant's 	[Opposition 
mark has 	Dismissed
acquired dis-	(based on 
tinctiveness	findings of
under Section 	non-generic-
2(f)   		ness and 
		acquired
		distinctive-
		ness of
		applicant's 
		mark)]      

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
