Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

9-30   		OPP   		105,884   		Starfish Software,
							Inc. v. FileTrak
							Software, Inc. 

9-30   		EX   		75/240,225     		Chewing Brush,
							Inc.

9-30   		EX   		75/159,195   		Cortec Corp.      

9-30   		EX   		75/293,155   		Nu Skin Int'l.,
							Inc.   

				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(d)   		Opposition	"SIDEKICK"		"FILEKICK"
		Dismissed  	[various computer 	[computer 
 				software products]	software for file 
							management]

2(e)(1)         Refusal					"CHEWING BRUSH"
		Affirmed				[tooth brushes] 
		(but only to 
		the extent of 
		requiring 
		applicant to 
		submit a 
		disclaimer of 
		the word 
		BRUSH)

2(e)(1)      	Refusal					"MIGRATING
[gener-		Affirmed				CORROSION
icness];	(on both				INHIBITORS"
whether  	grounds)				[chemical 
applicant's 						preparation for
mark, if not 						use in reduction 
generic, has						of corrosion of 
acquired dis-						steel reinforcing 
tinctiveness						members present 
under 							in concrete
Sec. 2(f)   						structures] 

2(d)        	Refusal					"HAIRFITNESS"
		Affirmed				[hair care and 
      							styling prepara-
							tions, namely,
							shampoos, hair 
							and scalp 
							conditioners, 
							hair detangling 
							preparations,
							etc.]   

Marks and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

						No

"HAIR FITNESS"					No
(and design)
[vitamin and nutritional
supplements for the hair] 

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 

