Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

8-27   		EX   		74/631,589   		Greenleaf, Inc.   

8-27   		EX   		74/700,586   		LeGrand Bennett
							and Anne Bennett

8-27   		EX   		75/108,390   		Dennis Bearden   

				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

de jure		Refusal					configuration 
function-	Affirmed				of the flatpack 
ality;		(on both				envelope that 
whether		grounds)				serves as a con-
applicant's						tainer for
product							applicant's goods
configuration 						[air fresheners]  
has become
distinctive 
under
Section 2(f)   

de jure		Refusal					the brim configur-
function- 	Affirmed				ation of a sun 
ality;      	(but only on 				visor or cap 
whether		ground that 				[visors and caps] 
applicant's	applicant's
product		product
configura-	configuration
tion is		is not
inherently	inherently
distinctive   	distinctive) 

2(d)   		Refusal					"CENTURY A/C
		Affirmed				SUPPLY"
      							(and design) 
							[wholesale
							distributorships 
							featuring air     
							conditioning sup-
							plies for 
 							contractors and 
							for multi-family 
							housing]   

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

"CENTURY"					No
[electronic air cleaners;
air conditioners; gas, oil
and electric furnaces;
heat pumps, blowers,
coils, coil cabinets,
electric duct heaters,
humidifiers, air handlers 
and condensing units]   

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
