Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

7-30   		OPP   		92,897   		Texaco Inc. v.
							Texlon Corp. 

7-30   		EX   		74/468,937   		Lombardo   
  
7-30   		OPP   		98,504   		Reidl
							Uhrengrosshandels
							GmbH   


				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(d)   		Opposition	"TEXACO" and other	"TEXLON"
		Sustained	marks incorpora-	[oil-based motor 
		[on basis of 	ting "TEXACO"		oil additive for 
		opposer's	[various petroleum	improving the per-
		mark TEXACO 	products, in-		formance of motor
		and opposer's 	cluding automotive	vehicles for 
		various logos 	oils and greases;	retail sale to the 
		featuring	gas station 		general public]    
		TEXACO, TEX-	services]; 
		LUBE, and 	a family of "TEX"-
		TEXOL but not 	formative marks
		on basis of	[petroleum-based 
		opposer's  	products]   
		alleged
		family of 
		"TEX-" marks]

2(d)    	Refusal					"MR. PITA ROLLED
		Affirmed				SANDWICHES &
      							SALADS"
							(and design)
							[restaurant 
							services] 

2(d)     	Opposition				"JACQUES LAURENT"
		Dismissed  				[watches, key 
    							chains of precious
							metals, jewelry,
							attache cases, 
							handbags, purses, 
							wallets, key 
							cases]   

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

"MR. PITA-NO					No
CHOLESTEROL!
LOW IN CALORIES!
NO OILS, FATS, OR
SUGARS ADDED!"
(and design)
[pocket breads and
bread chips]   

"JACQUES LEMANS"				No
[watches and alarm clocks]

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
