Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

4-30   		EX   		75/031,114   		Hinkle-Washington 
							Joint Venture

4-30   		OPP   		86,368      		Seattle Pacific
							Industries, Inc.
 							v. Brieland
							Professional
							Graphics, Ltd.

4-30   		EX   		75/143,885     		Family Images, Inc.

				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(e)(1)   	Refusal					"DRIVER-ID"
		Affirmed				[anti-theft alarms 
      							for vehicles]

2(d)         	Opposition	"HEET"			"DRY HEAT"
		Sustained  	[clothing and 		[imprinted sports-
 				sportswear gar-		wear, namely, 
				ments, namely, 		shirts, tank tops,
				jeans, blouses, 	sweatshirts, t-
				shirts, jackets,	shirts and caps]  
				slacks, pants, 
				tee-shirts, and
				sweaters];
				"HEET"
				(in stylized 
				lettering)
				[clothing and 
				sportswear gar-
				ments, namely, 
				shirts, slacks, 
				pants, blouses,
				jackets, tee-
				shirts, sweaters,
				jeans, and hats]

2(d)     	Refusal					"FAMILY STORIES-
		Affirmed				CELEBRATING
      							FAMILY HERITAGE"
							(and design)
							[providing cus-
							tomized videos 
							for others]   

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

"THE FAMILY 					No
STORIES COMPANY"
[videotape production
of keepsake videos]

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
