Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

12-4   		OPP		87/789   		Neostrata Co.,
		(R)					Inc. and Herald
							Pharmacal, Inc.
							v. Neoteric
							Cosmetics, Inc.

12-4   		OPP		96,518			Recot, Inc.
							v. M. C. Becton

				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

genericness;	Request for				"ALPHA HYDROX"
2(e)(1);	Reconsider-				[skin lotions]
whether		ation Denied
applicant's	[Opposition 
mark is		Dismissed
registrable	(registration
under Section	under 
2(f)		Sec. 2(f) 
[On request 	permitted);
for recon-	decision will
sideration,	not be marked
opposer asks 	as "citable 
that decision 	precedent"]
be marked as
"citable
precedent"]

2(d)   		Opposition	"FRITO-LAY" et al.	"FIDO LAY"
		Dismissed	[potato chips, 		[edible dog
				corn chips, and a 	treats] 
				variety of other 
				food items]

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						Yes

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
