Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

9-25            OPP             96,405   		Bridgestone/
							Firestone, Inc. v.
							Interco Tire Corp. 

9-25            EX              75/023,135   		Enersyst  
							Development
							Center 

9-25     	EX		74/658,746   		Auto Parts 
		(R)					Club, LLC   
   
				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

de jure		Opposition				configuration of 
function-	Sustained				the tread design 
ality;		(but only on 				of a tire asserted
acquired	the grounds 				as a trademark for
distinctive-	of lack of				applicant's tires  
ness [under 	acquired dis-
Sec. 2(f)]   	tinctiveness)

2(e)(1)   	Refusal					"AIR FRYER"
		Affirmed				[ovens, namely,
      							commercial cooking  
							impingement and
							convection ovens]

2(e)(1)  	Request for				"AUTO PARTS CLUB"
[genericness]   Reconsidera-    			[discount whole-
		tion Denied				sale and retail 
		[Refusal				store services in 
		Affirmed]   				the field of 
							automotive parts] 
   
Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

						No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
