Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

9-10            EX              74/731,211              Fisheye, Inc.   

9-10            EX              74/677,288              FMC Corp.   

9-10            EX              74/490,595   		Timothy J. Sheehan   

9-11            OPP             96,404   		The Goodyear Tire 
							and Rubber Co. v. 
							Interco Tire Corp. 
  
				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

Sec. 6 		Refusal					"FISHEYE"
disclaimer	Affirmed				(and fish design)
requirement						[underwater video
(of word						cameras]      
"FISHEYE")   
							"ALSTAR"
2(d)         	Refusal					(and design)
		Affirmed				[traps, namely, 
      							bait stations 
							containing an
							oxidative phos-
							phorylation 
							uncoupler for at-
							tracting and kil-
							ling ants] 

2(e)(3)     	Refusal					"CUBITA"
		Reversed				[coffee] 
    
de jure		Opposition				configuration of 
function-   	Sustained				the tread design 
ality;		(but only on 				of a tire asserted
acquired	the grounds 				as a trademark for
distinc-	of lack of				applicant's tires 
tiveness	acquired dis-
[under 		tinctiveness) 
Sec. 2(f)]

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

"ALL STAR"					No
[pesticides, namely,
bug and ant killing
compositions for
institutional and
industrial use];
"ALLSTAR"
(and design)
[janitorial preparations
for institutional and
industrial use, namely,
pesticides]   

     						No

						No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
