  Summary of Final Decisions Issued by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

 			   August 10-14, 1998


   				
Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

8-10   		EX   		74/436,521   		Klein Bicycle Corp.   

8-11   		CANC		21,309			Allied-Sysco 
		(R)		 			Food Services,
		CANC		21,321			Inc. v. The 
		(R)  					Pizza Maker

8-12            OPP             96,631      		Conopco, Inc. v. 
							Shangrila, Inc. 

8-13            EX              74/599,446     		JB Oxford
							Holdings, Inc. 
    
				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(d)   		Refusal					"PRIME"
		Affirmed				[high technology 
      							bicycle tire rims] 

abandonment   	Request for				"THE PIZZA MAKER"
		Reconsidera-				(and design)
		tion Denied 				[franchising 
		[Petitions to 				services, namely, 
		Cancel 					offering technical 
		Granted]      				assistance in the
							establishment 
							and/or operation 
							of pizza 
							restaurants; 
							restaurant 
							services];
							"THE PIZZA MAKER!"
							[pizza] 

genericness;    Opposition 				"CERAMIDEA"
mere descrip-	Dismissed  				[a complete line
tiveness   						of nonmedicated 
							skin care prep-
    							arations] 

2(d)        	Refusal					"JB OXFORD
		Reversed				HOLDINGS"
      							[securities 
							brokerage serv-
							ices, namely,
							brokerage services 
							at reduced prices 
							featuring low com-
							missions, flat
							rate commissions, 
							and commission-
							free trading]   

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

"PRIME AERO"					No
(in stylized lettering)
[bicycles and structural
parts, namely, frames,
brakes, chains,
handlebars, saddles,
gears, wheels, and gear
shifters]   

						No

						No

"OXFORD"					No
(in stylized lettering)
[investment management services,
namely, investing the
funds of others by
purchasing stock in
order to gain managing
control of the acquired
companies]   

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
