   		Type		Proceeding
Date		of		or			Party/
Issued		Case (1)	App'n No. 		Parties

2-24            EX              74/664,809   		Phil Posthuma and
							Cordell Langeland

2-26            EX              74/448,220              Carmen D. Caserta   
 
2-26            CANC            24,090     		In-Flight Phone 
							Corp. v. J. 
							Anselmo, Inc.   

				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

whether the 	Refusal      				"PHANTASM"
matter sought 	Affirmed				[entertainment
to be regis-						services in the 
tered func-						nature of live 
tions as a 						theater produc-
service mark 						tion]     
for the serv-
ices recited 
in the appli-
cation or 
functions, 
instead,
only as the 
title of a 
single crea-
tive work   

whether, as 	Refusal					"FURR-BALL 
evidenced by 	Affirmed      				FURCANIA"
the specimens 						[children's books 
of record, 						and periodical
the matter 						publications, 
sought to be 						namely, comic 
registered 						strips and comic
functions as 						magazines]      
a trademark	
for the goods 	
identified in 
the applica-
tion or func-
tions, in-
stead, only
as a ficti-
tious char-
acter name   

whether reg-	Petition to 				"SKY LIMO"
istrant had	Cancel					(and design)
used its mark 	Granted					[transportation of
in commerce 	(but only on 				passengers by
as of the is-	the ground of				limousine, vans, 
sue date of 	non-use of 				buses and cars]  
its registra-	the mark as 
tion; fraud   	of the date 
		of registra-
		tion)      

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						Yes

						Yes

						No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION 
