
--SOVIET SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS--

     This briefing presents the basic concepts of Soviet Scalar
electromagnetic weapons, some of the major types available, and evidence
of their widespread testing.

- Scalar Electromagnetics is Electrogravitation -

     Scalar electromagnetics is an extension of present electromagnetics
(EM) to include gravitation. That is, a unified electrogravitation, and,
what is more important, it is a unified engineering theory. Its basis
was discovered by Nikola Tesla.

     In the scalar EM extension, EM field energy can be turned into
gravitational field energy and vice versa. This exchange can be
patterned and localized, in specific areas and objects. Such a
controlled change of electromagnetics to gravitation is not possible in
the normal EM or physics presently taught in Western textbooks. However,
the bits and pieces of the theory have been scattered through the
physics literature for some time, but no orthodox western scientist
seems to have realized that these anomalous portions could be integrated
into a startling new physics. Unorthodox experimenters, inventors, and
scientists have made discoveries in this arena for several decades, but
again have not realized the exact implications or th precise manner in
which their results could be combined with present electrical physics.

- Fer-De-Lance -

     Such sluggishness is certainly not present in the Soviet Union. For
over three decades, the Soviet Union has been developing
electrogravitation and applying it to develop strange new secret weapons
of incredible power and capability. They have sustained the largest
weapons development program ever launched by any nation, and they have
kept it effectively hidden from prying western eyes. I have called this
program "Fer-De-Lance", after the deadly South American pit viper of the
same name.

     The dreaded fer-de-lance is a snake of great agility and lethal
effect. It often ambushes its hapless prey, and strikes unexpectedly and
without warning. Its first sudden strike is usually lethal to its
victim, which promptly expires in writhing agony. Since the Soviet
development of scalar EM weapons has been designed for the same purpose,
the name seems appropriate.

     The equivalent effort of about seven Manhattan projects has been
poured into fer-de-lance by the Soviets, and the program has been
successful almost beyond imagination. The eerie weapons are now
developed, deployed, and tested. The ambush has been completed;
Fer-de-Lance is coiled and ready to strike.



--ENERGETICS AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (DEW'S)--

     The ordinary Soviet name for this type of weapons science is
energetics. In the west that term is believed to be associated with
conventional directed energy weapons (DEWs) such as particle beam
weapons, lasers, radio-frequency (RF) directed energy devices, etc. The
Soviets do not limit the term in this way.

     Western scientists are familiar only with directed energy weapons
where fragments, masses, photons, or particles travel through space and
contact the target to deliver their effects. Hence in their thinking
they limit the Soviet term "energetics" to the type of weapons they
themselves understand -- exotic but normal weapons using energy or mass
traveling through space to impact a target.

     However, it is possible to focus the potential for the effects of a
weapon through spacetime itself, in a manner so that mass and energy do
not "travel through space" from the transmitter to the target at all.
Instead, ripples and patterns in the fabric of spacetime itself are
manipulated to meet and interfere in and at the local spacetime of some
distant target. There interference of these ripple patterns creates the
desired energetic effect (hence the term energetics) directly in and
through the target itself, emerging from the very spacetime (vacuum) in
which the target is imbedded at its distant location. As used by the
Soviets, energetics refers to these eerie new superweapons, as well as
to the more mundane DEWs known to the west.

     As a consequence of the Soviet breakthrough and decades of feverish
development, monstrous strategic weapons undreamed of in the West are
already in Soviet hands. A noose is slowly and steadily being tightened
about our throats, and it is already the 11th hour.

--THE SOVIETS USE A DECEPTION PLAN--

     Concomitant with this supersecret development program, the Soviets
developed and implemented an elaborate deception pln o onceal these
startling weapons and their nature from Western eyes until it is too
late. Soviet deception has been so successful that even when Western
scientists are confronted with the actual tests of these weapons
directly over their heads, they do not recognize the weaponry nor the
nature of the effects produced.

     As early as January 1960, Nikita Khrushchev announced the Soviet
development of a new, fantastic weapon.

     On April 10 1963 one of the first new superweapons operationally
deployed was used to destroy  the U.S.S. Thresher atomic submarine
underwater, off the east coast of the U.S. The next day, April 11, 1963
the same deployed superweapon was utilized in a different mode to
produce a giant underwater explosion in the ocean over the Puerto Rican
Trench, 100 miles north of Puerto Rico.

     Over the years, various aircraft were interfered with or downed as
tests of these Soviet weapons. A particular case involved the mysterious
loss of F-111 in the Vietnam conflict. At least one downed F-111 crew
was recovered in the subsequent prisoner of war exchange. On that
aircraft all electrical systems were in difficulty simultaneously. This
was probably due t special Soviet teams converting some North Vietnamese
SA-2 missile system radars to the scalar EM mode, and employing "scalar
beam" interference to produce spurious EM noise throughout the
electrical and electronic systems of the aircraft.


     In late April /early May of 1985, the entire armada of Soviet
strategic scalar EM superweapons was activated as a special celebration
of the 40th anniversary of the end of W.W.II. Activation of this armada
(which probably contained over 100 giant weapons), together with 27
giant power systems and a large number of command and control
transmissions, was monitored on an advanced, proprietary detection
system by Frank Golden. After the gigantic strategic exercise, which
lasted several days, most of the weapons and power sources were once
again stood down to "standby."

     The NASA shuttle launches provided an convenient opportunity for
Soviet testing of these superweapons in a launch phase ABM mode, where a
launched missile can be detected and destroyed shortly after liftoff. At
first, electromagnetic pulse (EMP) bursts on the early shuttle
trajectory were deliberately delayed in time, to prevent actual
destruction of the target and avoid alerting the U.S. that something
unusual was happening.

     The shuttle launch of November 26, 1985 saw a particularly
significant test of this kind. In this case, a very loud "sonic boom" or
explosion occurred over the launch site 12 minutes after shuttle
liftoff, when the shuttle was already away and downrange. At least two
previous shuttle launches had also been used as pseudotargets, with
delayed booms occurring over the launch site well behind the vehicles.

     After lack of U.S. reaction to these tests showed that the U.S.
still had no knowledge of the new technology and did not even recogize
its employment, the Soviets apparently decided to proceed with tests
where the target would actually be destroyed.

     On December 12, 1985 the same Soviet weapon tested against the NASA
shuttle launches deliberately interfered with the controls of an Arrow
DC-8 taking off from Gander Air Force Base, Newfoundland. At an altitude
of 100 feet, the aircraft--carrying over 250 U.S. soldiers and civilian
crew members- -lost power and sank into the ground tail-low, killing
everyone on board. Three Canadian witnesses to the crash were
interviewed over the Canadian Broadcast Corporation's television news on
April 8,1986 at 10 p.m. No flame or smoke issued from the plane before
its descent and crash. However the aircraft was seen to be mysteriously
glowing with a yellow glow. That is a signature of the use of a scalar
howitzer in the "continuous EM emergence" mode, similar to the manner in
which the F-111s were downed in Vietnam. In short, the DC-8s electrical
systems were interfered with by electromagnetic noise created throughout
the spacetime occupied by the aircraft. The powerful charge created in
and around the aircraft also apparently caused the loss of two engines,
one after the other. With its controls ineffective, and its power
drastically reduced, the aircraft sank to earth, still in its "tail
down" configuration from takeoff, and crashed and burned. The "yellow
glow" was a corona due to the acquisition of a high electrical charge by
the skin of the aircraft.

     Other factors contributing to the crash may have been reduced lift
due to poor engine maintenance, increased weight of the aircraft due to
icing, and heavy loading. Still, no one has recognized the significance
of the "yellow glow" or what it implies, or the possible connection
between the loss of the aircraft and previous Soviet testing of a Launch
Phase ABM system against U.S. shuttle launches...

     As of September 1987, the last two Air Force Titan 34-D missiles
fired from Vandenburg Air Force Base in California have blown up shortly
after launch. The first one blew up on Aug. 28, 1985 just after
lift-off. That loss had been attributed to failure of a high powered
fuel pump, causing a massive oxidizer leak and a smaller fuel leak. The
second Titan loss occurred on April 18, 1986 when the missile blew up 5
seconds after lift off. Its loss is still under investigation and no
determination of cause has been made. Apparently the shuttle and the
Titan presently provide the only viable launch vehicles for launching
U.S. "spy" satellites. The loss of these sensitive satellites-- if
indeed they constituted the payloads--cannot help but be damaging to our
strategic capability. According to the Los Angeles Times (in 1986) the
single remaining KH-11 satellite was launched in December 1984 and, with
an expected life of two to three years, could stop functioning later
this year.

     Whether or not significant Woodpecker grid activity existed in the
vicinity of the Titan launch of August 1985 is unknown atthis time.
However, significant activity in the grid definitely occurred before the
April 18 Titan disaster and on the same day.

     On Easter Sunday, Mar. 30,1986 engineer Ron Cole observed
significant correlated with Soviet Woodpecker measurements. On April 18,
T.E Bearden, perhaps the head of SEM research today, observed traces of
a cloud radial over Huntsville, Alabama and took photographs of it.
Preliminary reports from Thousand Oaks Ca. indicate extensive grid
activity again on April 18, the day the second Titan exploded.

     At least the second of these two missile destructions shortly after
launch is suspicious, since the grid positively was active during that
time. Also, a clear trail of Launch Phase ABM system indicators exists
back to the massive scalar exercise of April/May 1985. The first Titan
explosion in Aug. 1985 thus falls within the Soviets "now lets test them
against the U.S. launch vehicles" period. The second Titan loss follows
highly suspicious losses of the Arrow DC-8 on Dec. 12, 1985 and the
Challenger on Jan. 28, 1986. The same Soviet weapon that destroyed those
Q gets may have also destroyed one or both of the critical Titans.

     The Soviets also have been able to significantly engineer the
weather over North America for more than a decade without being found
out. They have tested a fantastic range of anti-ballistic missile (ABM)
defense weapons for over two decades, and no one is the wiser in the
West.

     As previously stated, prior to the end of November, 1985, at least
three "wet-run" tests of a Soviet "launch phase ABM system" against
actual U.S. shuttle launches were made directly over Cape Canaveral
itself, and still no one recognized what was happening or what sort of
weapon was being tested. On December 12, destruction of the Arrow DC-8
in Newfoundland produce no indications that the Americans and Canadians
knew anything about the nature of the weapon possibly used.

     Accordingly, after a sufficient wait to test our reactions (if
any), the Soviets prepared to actually destroy a shuttle after its
launch...



--DESTRUCTION OF THE CHALLENGER, JANUARY, 1986--

     As the whole world knows, on January 28, 1986 the Challenger was
launched from Cape Canaveral Florida after exposure to undesirable
weather conditions, and disastrously exploded shortly after launch. The
evidence seems to indicate that , as the rising vehicle was stressed,
one end of its right booster broke loose, twisting away and into the
main fuel tank, causing rupture, spillage of the fuel, and catastrophic
explosion. Several other anomalies still exist however, and it is clear
that a problem existed with at least one of the booster seals. All seven
astronauts aboard the flight were killed in the fiery destruction of the
vehicle.

    Of course no one had recognized that the Soviets had already tested
a launch-phase anti-ballistic missile (LPABM) system against three of
our previous shuttle launches. These "wet-runs" used a deliberate
"time-offset" t delay the explosive emergence of electromagnetic energy
in a launched shuttle's location along its trajectory. The delayed test
shots resulted in very large "booms" above the launch site after the
shuttle was safely out of the area, but did not destroy the shuttles
themselves. For example, the delayed shot-boom occurred 12 minutes after
the evening launch of Nov. 26, 1985. Even a marker beacon (large light
in the sky) was utilized on that launch shortly after lift-off. The
marker beacon was photographed. In addition another photograph taken in
a time sequence shows another sudden streak of light coming down and
ending in a burst of light. This was probably a spatially-offset test of
the "pulse mode" for destroying the shuttle. The "light burst" would
have been detected in the Soviet Union and scored against its intended
offset position. However, another mechanism was used to cause the
destruction of the shuttle itself.

     On Jan. 1, 1986 the presence of a metal softening signal added on
to the Soviet LPABM systems scalar EM transmissions was detected by a
surprised Frank Golden. The metal softening ability of the detected
signal was experimentally verified by him at that time. Golden also
locally nullified the action of the scalar EM signal in a test, rather
conclusively establishing (1) that it existed and (2) what it was. The
signal was apparently being prepared for use against an upcoming U.S.
shuttle launch.

     Just prior to the launch of the shuttle in late January, 1986, the
Soviets accomplished significant weather engineering over the U.S. The
jet stream was severely bent southward in the middle of the U.S.,
bending rightward again to move across the Florida panhandle. Icy cold
air from Canada was drawn far down, into Florida and onto the Challenger
sitting on it launch pad. This exposure to cold outside its tested range
was probably an additional factor contributing to the Challengers
failure. Positive signatures of the Soviet weather engineering and jet
stream manipulation were observed and photographed by several persons,
particularly in Alabama and California...


     On January 28, 1986, the Soviet scalar EM weapon system effects
were sharply localized in the launch zone. Localization involved higher
frequencies being present; these are quite painful to small
brains--whose hemispheres act as a scalar interferometer and
detector--such as in birds. As commented upon by national news
commentators, strangely the birds were not flying that morning. Indeed,
they were staying down on the ground or avoiding the area, since the sky
over the area was painful to them.

     As Q" Challenger rose, the metal softening signal would have been
experienced in and around the boosters shortly after ignition, since the
booster flame acts as a special "ion-plasma" tuner/detector for the
scalar signal. The effect of such a local signal is to "charge mass in
the immediate vicinity" with the particular scalar resonance signal.

     The ill fated Challenger was doomed. After ignition, the booster
flame acted as a ionic plasma detector/amplifier for the metal
softening signal on the Soviet Woodpecker grid. The metal in and around
the booster flame was slowly and steadily weakening due to a charge up
with the metal softening pattern. This contributed to booster leakage
from the already cold damaged seal. The leaking booster poured out smoke
and later flame, contributing to the impending disaster.

     Substantial winds and air turbulence over the site increased the
stress on the Challenger as it rose through this region. This also
contributed to the disaster and may have been deliberately created there
by Soviet Weather engineering.

     As the Challenger stressed, eventually one or more weakened mounts
gave way, partially freeing the end of the right booster. Another
anomalous flame or light was observed on the vehicle, and may have
represented a very small additional "pulse mode energy form" produced
from the weapon that was already attacking the Challenger. Te booster
oscillated, rotating into the tank and rupturing it. Contact of the
escaping liquid fuel and the flame resulted in a fiery explosion,
destroying the vehicle and killing those on board...

      By creating excess cold exposure to the shuttle, inducing metal
softening in and around the ignited booster, and possibly adding a
deliberate "intensely hot spot", THE SOVIETS CAUSED THE CHALLENGER TO
WEAKEN AND DESTROY ITSELF SHORTLY AFTER LAUNCH, IN SO SUBTLE A FASHION
THAT NASA SCIENTISTS WOULD NOT SUSPECT WHAT HAD ACTUALLY CAUSED THE
MISHAP. THE SOVIETS HAD ALSO PREVIOUSLY WITHDRAWN ALL THEIR TRAWLERS AND
SHIPS WHICH NORMALLY SHADOW A SHUTTLE LAUNCH, TO PREVENT ANY SUGGESTION
OF SOVIET PRESENCE NEAR OR INVOLVEMENT IN THE CATASTROPHIC ACCIDENT.

      A few days later, sporadically intense "high frequency
localization signals" were still present on the grid, at least one
hinge-point at Birmingham, Alabama confirmed this. From 1-4 February
1986, many birds inadvertently flew into the zone when an intense
breakout occurred, and birds fell dead from the sky in substantial
numbers....

Next: -Technological Surprise and a New Hiroshima-

(To be Continued)


      Sadly, the bureaucratic smugness of orthodox Western scientists
has materially assisted the Soviet deception process. Most Western
managerial scientists -particularly in weapons development activities -
have continued to view the Soviets as ignorant peasants, still trying to
clean the mud off their boots. This view is of course, Totally untrue
and unwarranted.

      It takes only a few examples to refute this attitude. In nonlinear
mathematics, engineering and science, the Soviets have led their Western
counterparts since the beginning. The electromagnetic pulse (EMP) effect
of a nuclear explosion appeared in the ordinary Soviet scientific
literature before Western scientists were even aware that the effect
existed. The Soviets continue to lead the world in explosive welding,
titanium welding and forming, etc. While the Soviet scientists exhibit
little inclination to build good washing machines, they certainly do
produce state of the art technology-- and beyond-- in any area in which
they focus their main efforts. (We do lead the Soviets in some areas
such as computers computer, computer software, miniaturization, etc.)

      Once before, a modern nation, the United States, developed a
mighty weapon in secrecy and used it to force a powerful foe, Japan, to
its knees... The mindbending atomic blows to Hiroshima, and Nagasaki,
showed once and for all that in the modern age technological surprise
can prove instantly disastrous. Yet in our scientific arrogance, we have
assumed that it could never happen to us, and that the "secret weapon"
scenario will never be repeated. On the contrary, it HAS happened again,
someone else has done it, and it has happened to us.

      It has also become fashionable in the West to believe that all the
laws of physics are already discovered. We assume we know all of them.
While we have been pridefully crowing this tune, the Soviets have been
steadily new laws in secret, as well as new ways to circumvent the old
laws. Our defense is strategic, we rely on our offense. Our huge nuclear
arsenal.. If this offense were nullified or destroyed by Soviet secret
weapons, we would be powerless to prevent our own destruction and Soviet
domination of our world.

       We have been viewing ourselves as indestructible, confident in
the strength of our defense. Yet literally our defense has been stripped
from us. Indeed Soviet energetics weapons are now capable of destroying
our defense, our homeland, our armed forces in the field, and our
population, quickly and efficiently. We have a new gap of monumental
proportions: not a missile gap, not  a submarine or bomber gap, and not
even a particle beam or laser gap. We have a "Scalar Electromagnetics or
Electrogravitation" gap.....


       He that has ears, let him hear.

       Here is the secret of antigravity.

       The "electrical charge" of a charged particle-- such as one of
the charged particles of an atom or one of the protons of its nucleus--
represents a difference in flux intensity (potential) between the local
particle and its ambient vacuum.  Its the continual bleed-off of
gravitational charge as electrical charge.  If that bleed off is
reversed or stopped, a drastic effect on the gravitational charge
ensues. The 5-potential and the 5-charge have become 4-G-potential and
4-d-charge respectively.  Thus "charging" an object with its scalar EM
pattern charges it gravitationally.  Now the only "bleed off channel" is
through the 4-G force field. Further, in a nucleus the nucleons
continually back and forth between proton and neutron, so the electrical
charge is "spread" throughout the nucleus and shared by all the
nucleons.

       Further, each element (actually each isotope) has its own unique
"ensemble pattern" of Fourier expansion scalar frequencies, amplitudes,
etc. This pattern can, of course, be reproduced artificially and
transmitted by modified EM transmitters). There is, however, a sort of
"master key" scalar EM (EG) pattern for nucleons (protons and neutrons
which are changing back and forth into each other by exchange of virtual
charge currents). If one reverses the charge by inverting this pattern,
and then "charges up a mass with the inverted charge," to the external
observer the charging mass just gets lighter and lighter, and its
inertia gets less and less. Eventually it seems (to him) to acquire
negative mass and negative inertia, and just accelerate away from the
earth. the object falls upward instead of falling downwards.

       There are also some weird time effects; that object can be moving
slower through time than the laboratory observer, or even be moving
backwards through time in respect to the laboratory observer. (Don't
believe everything they taught you in relativity; none of those guys
ever had engineered a single general relativistic situation. &nothing
they teach in GR is based on direct experiment. Most of what they teach
has already experimentally proven to be in error.


       This is the concept for a scalar EG detector for a scalar EG
waves. This is the Bendini scalar wave detector, adapted from an
original concept by Dea and Faretto.

       The idea is quite simple: install a very powerful bar magnet
inside a grounded Faraday cage. Then install an open-ended coil
longitudinally above the magnet so that a line through the longitudinal axis
of the magnet passes through the longitudinal axis of the coil above it.
The open end of the coil does not touch the magnet.

        Connect the other end of the coil to a variable tuning
capacitor, so that the coil and the capacitor form a tunable,
series-L-C-oscillatory circuit. The output of the capacitor is connected
to a transistorized preamplifier inside the cage. A tuning shaft for the
capacitor is very carefully placed through a small hole in the shield to
allow tuning from outside.

         The output of the preamp passes through a small hole in the
shield, through a shielded cable, to an adjacent oscilloscope. The cable
shield is also grounded t a reference ground potential.

         The theory is as follows: Suppose a normal EM wave appears
inside the cage, above the magnet or closely adjacent thereto. In that
case a coupled oscillation appears in the field of the magnet, and this
oscillation is coupled to the coil immediately above it. If the
oscillation is within the bandwidth of the tuned series LC circuit,
detection occurs. This is amplified by the preamp and passed to the
oscilloscope, where it is displayed on the scope.

 Note that the detector detects normal EM wave. Now our problem is: How
do we get an EG wave to be detected? And how do we assure that we do not
detect ordinary EM waves from the outside?  Actually this is simple.
Ordinary waves (except for quite low frequency) will be grounded out by
the Faraday shield, and will not penetrate the cage. Thus these normal
EM waves cannot enter the cage and appear above the magnet. They will
not be detected. Scalar EG waves, on the other hand, will enter the cage
since they do not couple to conduction electrons in the metal of the
cage. Above the pole of the magnet, spacetime is locally bent.  After
all, a pole is a magnetostatic scalar potential, which is a part of the
conglomerate called "G-potential." The pole represents an increase (or
decrease, depending on whether it is a north or a south pole) in the
magnetostatic component of the local G-potential. This is a curvature of
spacetime. An EG wave entering this region adds a varying component
of magnetostatic G-potential, which bleeds off in the coil as
an ordinary EM wave.

         Another way to view the detector is to model the EG wave as a
longitudinal wave, and an ordinary EM wave as a transverse wave. When the
EG wave enters the curved spacetime region above the magnet, to the coil
(the "observer" in this case!) the longitudinal aspectofthe EG wave
appears to be rotating back and forth, so that an oscillating transverse
component is present. This transverse component appears to the coil as
an ordinary EM field, and so the LC circuit detects it if it is in the
proper frequency band.

         Yet another way to view the situation is to realize that an EG
wave entering the magnet results in an oscillating component added to
the magnetostatic scalar potential (pole strength) of the magnet.
Accordingly, the magnet is a receiver for scalar waves, which are
detected to "bleed-off" as an oscillation of the magnetic field strength
of the magnet. Coupling of this oscillating magnetic field to the coil
creates an oscillating current flow into the capacitor. This oscillates
the voltage input to the preamp, which amplifies and feeds the signal to
the oscilloscope for display.

         It is important to remember that a magnetostatic potential and
an electrostatic potential can be oscillated by a scalar EG wave. By
placing a magnetic material inside a Faraday cage, the oscillation of
the magnetostatic scalar potential (pole strength of the magnet) can be
used as the EG detecting mechanism. By placing a chargeable material
inside a Faraday cage, the oscillation of the electrostatic scalar
potential can be detected. (Possible examples of the latter type
detectors are given by Hodowanec,"Radio Electronics," April 1986.)

         Note also that one may detect waves at one reference level and
not at another. Changing the bias on the zero-reference ground of the
Bendini detector affects the detection. To look inside a normal EM
carrier (such as the Soviet Woodpecker carrier) and see what scalar
signals are riding upon it, the carrier may be used to bias the
reference ground of the Bendini detector. To produce a spectrum
analyzer, simply use additional series resonant LC tuning circuits in
parallel (put multiple taps on the coil, and wire each tap to a separate
tuning capacitor of different capacitance). Again, varying the zero
reference level is important, as is varying  the strength of the magnet.
Frank Golden has also invented an excellent series of scalar wave
detectors based on quite different proprietary principles.

         The bottom line is: we can indeed rigorously detect and measure
scalar EG waves. When one considers the large sums of money presently
being spent to bury large aluminum cylinders etc. in an attempt to
detect gravitational waves, one wonders why some funds could not be
released to a few unorthodox researchers by the National Academy of
Sciences to fund the proven creation and detection of
electrogravitational waves...

      Here is explained a new kind of resonance: scalar EM resonance, or
electrogravitational resonance.

      First, imagine we have a standard resonant cavity. In this cavity
we have a resonant EM wave moving back and forth. In accordance with
convention, the E-field vector and the B-field vector are at right
angles in this moving wave front. As the wave moves back and forth, the
vectors vary back and forth; however, at any one point between the
walls, the two vectors always have the same value. Thus our resonant EM
wave forms a standing wave in the cavity.

      Now imagine that a second wave front, precisely like the first and
of the same frequency, is superposed over the first one and travels with
it. This second wave -- the "antiwave" -- has its force vectors 180
degrees out of phase with the force vectors of the reference wave. Hence
the E-fields and B- fields of the two superposed waves always sum to
vector zeros, anywhere in the cavity. To an external observer, the
cavity contains no ordinary electromagnetic force fields, hence no
ordinary EM energy.

      However the energy density of a single EM sine wave in vacuum is
given by:


    ity   2
 [ E  +  B  ]/8pi

      This energy density is always positive. Hence the energy density
of the two waves at any point X between the walls is equal to:


    2    2
 [ E  + B ]/4pi

   where

E=E(x) ; B=B(x)

      Thus the energy density of vacuum varies with X. But, rigorously,
since the resultant E and B fields are zero, this describes a standing
gravitational wave. Hence we have a standing EG wave existing in the
cavity. This is an example of scalar resonance. Rigorously the cavity
has mass and inertia, to an outside observer, as a result of the two
warps in spacetime it contains.

      Note that in one half cycle the energy density of vacuum is
greater than ambient, and in the other half cycle it isless. In the
region of one half cycle, time flows at a faster rate than to the
ambient observer, and in the other half cycle time flows at a slower
rate than to the ambient observer. One half cycle appears to contain
negative electrical charge, and the other appears to contain positive
charge.

      One half cycle appears to contain a north pole (positive
magnetostatic scalar potential), and the other half cycle appears to
contain a south pole (negative magnetostatic scalar potential).

      Perhaps now one can begin to understand why a continuously
accelerated orbital electron in the atom does not radiate EM energy,
completely in violation of Maxwell's equations. The electron is naught
but a complex aspect

      Scalar resonance is not in the conventional textbook.

      Scalar resonance is a particular zero summed multi-resonance,
electromagnetically, so that it does not act in an electromagnetic
manner.

      A scalar resonance is a standing electromagnetic wave. It can be
made electrically, but is not electrical in behavior.

      In any scalar resonance, spacetime is curved, and it is the
magnitude (and direction) of this spacetime curvature that is
oscillating in "standing wave" fashion.

      In respect to stress of the vacuum medium, one half of a standing
sine wave of scalar resonance is tensile; the other half is compressive.
However, this is with respect to the local ambient stress of the vacuum.

      "Mass" of a particle is just a characteristic exhibited by a
trapped scalar resonance. Usually this trapping is done by the "spin" of
the individual particle.

      The concept of "mass" may be compared with the concept of
"capacitance."   That is, a mass is an accumulator for scalar waves;
that is, for scalar resonances. It is continually being "charged" and
"discharged" by absorption and emission of scalar waves from and to the
ambient vacuum scalar wave flux.

      Indeed the magnitude of a mass may be defined in terms of the
absolute value of this "switching" (absorption = switch in; emission =
switch out) rate. For details on this see (Bearden, T.E.
"Quinton/Perception Physics: A Theory of Existence, Perception, and
Physical Phenomena," March, 1973, AD 763210, available through NTIS.)

      In the normal linear spacetime, the "charging" and "discharging"
are equal in all directions; so the mass exhibited in any direction is
the same.

      With respect to an "external observer's" equilibrium flux, a
moving object encounters an increased amount of flux rate along its line
of motion, just as a moving object in a rainstorm encounters more
raindrops per second in the direction of its path, than does a
stationary object. Encountering increased scalar wave flux (with respect
to the external observer) forces the moving object to absorb and emit
scalar waves at a higher rate along its direction of motion than when
its not moving. Thus to the external observer, the mass of the object
has increased, insofar as any disturbing force along its line of motion
is concerned.

      At right angles to its line of motion however, the flux rate is
precisely the same as when the object is at rest. Therefore the "mass"
of the moving object with respect to any disturbing force at right
angles to its line of motion has not changed, as seen by the external
observer.

      Thus is explained both parts of one of the all time great
mysteries of special relativity: (1) how the mass of an object increases
with respect to its motion,an (2) why the mass only increases with
respect to its line of motion, and not at any right angles to it.

      The inertia of a particle is due to its mass, i.e., to the total
magnitude of its trapped scalar resonance.

      The gravitational attraction between two masses is due to their
spacetime curvature. Further, mass is like a capacitance. It can trap
additional scalar waves as trapped resonance; hence increase its
magnitude or "inertial charge". Or, it can discharge more scalar waves
than it absorbs; hence decrease its magnitude or "internal charge"...

      Those scalar waves emitted from resonance are emitted as a pattern
ensemble of the resonance. Hence they may be regarded as constituting a
current of scalar resonance leaving the mass accumulator object. Scalar
waves absorbed into trapped resonance may be regarded as constituting a
current of scalar resonance into the mass accumulator object. Thus it is
proper to speak of scalar resonance as being able to "flow".

      Further, it is possible to increase the mass of an object
directly, by transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it absorbs them.
(By absorbing scalar waves one means that more enter the object than
leave it, so that the object acts as an internal accumulator charging up
with internal charge. This is done by insuring the reference potential
of the scalar wave transmitter is higher than the reference potential of
the irradiated object.)

      It is also possible to decrease the mass of an object directly, by
transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it emits more than it
absorbs. (By emitting scalar waves one means that more leave the object
than enter it, so the object acts as if it were an internal accumulator
that is discharging its internal charge. this is done by insuring that
the reference potential of the scalar transmitter is lower than the
reference potential of the irradiated object.)

       As can be seen, the scalar wave "transmitter" is actually
somewhat comparable to a heat pump; it can either act as an "energy
transmitter" or as an "energy extractor", depending on the difference in
potential between "transmitter" and "receiver."


       Scalar resonance can have a specific pattern: both in frequency
and in spatial curvature aspects, as well as "rate of flow of time"
aspects. Indeed, scalar-wise every object has its individual "scalar
pattern" which is a unique fingerprint. Since that print is
spatiotemporal, it is a product of that objects  entire past history.
Thus --scalar wise-- no two objects are identical.

       This brings up another rather amazing potential: If a reasonably
precise scalar pattern of an object can be "irradiated" and resonated
with scalar waves, energy may be created in or extracted from the
distant object, just as stimulating one tuning fork can excite another
at a distance by sympathetic resonance. I leave it to you to ascertain
the relevance of this statement to clairvoyance, radionics, remote
viewing, etc.

       For the skeptic, however, we must point out that
--rigorously--quantum mechanics requires that, continually, in any
localized region of spacetime, the "pattern" of any object in the
universe appears momentarily in the virtual state, purely from
statistical considerations alone. So long as the situation remains
statistical, any place in the universe can continue to have the "ghosts"
of everything present there, in an ethereally thin pattern, and the
observable world will not be affected by it. However if one can
discriminate and scalarly "charge" or "discharge" individual patterns in
this "ghost- realm", action at a distance is directly possible, as is
materialization and dematerialization. If one accepts that even thought
itself produces such virtual "ghost-patterns" in the virtual particle
flux of vacuum, then it is at least theoretically possible to
materialize thoughts and thought images.

        We have entered a new kind of reality where the old rules and
the old limitations do not necessarily apply.

        As pointed out, we can greatly simplify matters by considering
'currents of scalar resonance'. These currents flow from higher
potential to lower potential, regardless of whether we are considering
"transmission" or "reception".

        Indeed, to transmit at lower potential is to receive, and to
receive at higher potential is to transmit.  Thus the
"transmitter-receiver" is a special system where simply biasing two
nodes differently determines which way the scalar resonance will flow.
We may increase or decrease an object's inertia and mass, simply by
properly biasing the transmitter-receiver's two nodes.

        In one accidental experiment of some hours duration, Golden
charged up an area so that, locally, all clocks became erratic. This
included electrical clocks, battery driven watches, wind up kitchen
clocks, and a pendulum operated grandfather clock. The rate of flow of
time itself was apparently altered in the local area by the accumulated
charge, which took four days to drain off and discharge. At the end of
four days of discharge, all clocks and watches returned to normal.

      If we interfere two transmitters in a region of great energy--such
as the molten core of the earth itself--and bias the transmitters
negatively, we can extract enormous energy directly from that distant
source!

      Indeed, a slight variation of this effect is precisely how the
Soviet Union obtains the enormous energy with which to power its
incredibly powerful strategic "continent-buster" scalar EM weapons.
Scalar frequency pairs -- 12 kilohertz apart -- are transmitted into the
earth itself on some portion of the earth's "giant scalar resonance"
frequency curve. Biasing the two transmitters differently with respect
to each other produces a high potential difference (voltage) between
them. At the same time, biasing them both negative with respect to the
earth's molten core produces a scalar resonance current from the core to
the two transmitters. In the "outer loop" between the two scalar
transmitters, there appears a gigantic voltage and gigantic electrical
current which can be captured by appropriate means. This electrical
power is tapped off and transmitted to incredibly powerful scalar EM
weapon systems. There, special accumulators ad switchers are utilized to
provide awesome amounts of power to each weapon.

      Just before May 1,1985 the Soviet Union performed a "full-up"
operational test of their entire strategic scalar EM weapons complex.
This test was detected and monitored periodically by Frank Golden. Some
27 of these giant Soviet "power taps" were locked into the molten core
of the earth, producing forced (entrained) scalar resonance of the
entire planet on 54 controlled frequencies under our very feet. The
remainder of the scalar frequency spectrum was ablaze with literally
hundreds of Soviet scalar transmitters: probably the entire strategic
scalar command and control system to underwater submarines, higher
command centers, distant commands, etc. was actiated in the giant
exercise.

      For several days the system was exercised on a mind-boggling
scale, apparently as part of the Soviet Unions highly accentuated 40th
anniversary celebration of the end of World War II.

      Ironically, not a single U.S. intelligence agency, laboratory, or
scientist detected this monstrous exercise for the new Soviet leader,
Gorbachev. Not one of them had a detector for scalar EM radiation, and
not one of them will --officially-- say that the exercise ever happened.


-- CREATING ENERGY AT A DISTANCE --

      A most useful device is obtained if one uses a scalar interferometer
where the two transmitters transmit beams which intersect at a distance.

      In the interference zone, an energy bottle is created.

      By biasing the transmitter reference potentials well above that of
the distant energy bottle, EM energy emerges in that zone. In that case
the interferometer is operating in the Exothermic mode.

      By biasing the transmitter reference potentials well below that of
the distant energy bottle, EM energy is extracted from the distant zone
and emerges from the transmitter. In that case the interferometer is
operating in the Endothermic mode.

      If the transmitters transmit continuously, the effect in the
distant zone is continuous.

      If each transmitter transmits a pulse, and the two pulses meet in
the distant intersection zone, then an explosive emergence or extraction
of energy occurs at the distant interference zone, depnding on whether
the interferometer is operating in the exothermic or endothermic mode.


-- EXOTHERMIC MODE (SCALAR INTERFEROMETER) --

      For a scalar interferometer, "del phi" (the gradient of the
potential) applies between the transmitter sit and the distant
intersection site, not to the intervening space in between. Thus one
speaks of "energy flow" as being between the transmitter and
intersection --without- any "in between". In the intervening space, all
energy exists as locked-in artificial potential, not EM force field
energy (gradient bleed off potential).

      In the Exothermic mode, the ground potential of the transmitter is
biased well above the ground potential of ambient vacuum. Energy enters
the transmitter and "disappears", to "reappear" in the distant
interference zone.

      If continuous wave transmission is used, the energy continuously
appears in the distant zone.

      If pulse transmission is used and timed so that the two scalar
pulses meet in th dstntzoe,enrg explosively appears there.

      If multiple frequencies are transmitted in the manner of a Fourier
expansion of a particular geometric form, then a 3-dimensional energy
form appears at the distant intersection. In this manner a spherical or
hemispherical shell (a globe or "dome" of EM energy) can be created at a
distance. If pulse transmission is used, this will be an impulsive or
explosive emergence of that energy form. If continuous transmission is
used, this will be a continuous glowing form.

      By feeding incredibly powerful transmitters with large amounts of
energy extracted from the earth's molten core by "energy taps," very
large spherical globes and hemispherical domes of EM energy can be
created at a distance. The energy in the interference "shell" of such a
sphere or hemisphere is sufficiently dense to lift Dirac matter from the
Dirac sea of the vacuum. Thus the shell contains a glowing plasma.

      Many such scalar howitzer  signatures have been seen over the
oceans, particularly over the north Pacific by jet airliners flying into
and out of Japan. (Remember some months ago the big story about the JAL
flight in which all passengers and crew saw a giant spherical "UFO".)
Also such globes and domes of light have been seen deep within the
Soviet Union, by observers in Afghanistan and by pilots of aircraft
landing in Iran.

      In the impulsive exothermic mode, a large visible flash will occur
if EM energy in the visible spectrum is produced. "Flashes" in the
infrared may similarly occur, if the emerging energy is in that spectral
band. In September 1979 our Vela satellites detected such a large
"nuclear flash" over the South Atlantic, off the southern coast of
Africa. A second "nuclear flash" detected by the Vela satellites in 1980
was in the infrared only. Some years ago, a series of anomalous
"flashes" and "booms" occurred off the east coast of the United States.
The were due to the orientation and alignment -- and registration -- of
one r more "scalar howitzers" -- scalar EM interferometers in the
exothermic mode.

      Large "booms" occurred over the shuttle launch site at Cape
Canaveral, associated with three shuttle launches prior to the end of
November 1985. These were tests of such exothermic scalar EM howitzers,
being tested as part of the Soviet Launch Phase ABM system. In that
mode, the scalar pulses from the two transmitters are injected into
special zero-reference scalar EM "channels" established in the EM
carriers of the Woodpecker over-the-horizon radars. The scalar pulses
travel through these channels, traveling in the ordinary EM beam of the
transmitter and following it in its curvature around the earth in the
earth-ionospheric waveguide. The scalar pulses are timed, phased, and
oriented so as to meet the rising shuttle. In these tests the
transmissions were offset in time so the shuttle would not actually be
destroyed, but the system could be tested against actual shuttle
launches in the U.S.

      The specific uses of these various exothermic modes will be
covered in later parts of this series.

      In the endothermic mode, the bias on the transmitters is such that
energy is extracted from the distant intersection zone, to re-emerge
from the transmitters. There the energy must be caught and disposed of
if it is not to burn out the transmitters. When very large amounts of
energy are extracted from distant points, the Soviets often use a "dump"
method of temporarily capturing, and storing in an accumulator, the heat
energy emerging at the transmitters. A second howitzer in the exothermic
mode is then fed by a "scalar energy tap" established into the
accumulator. This howitzer is focused on the distant dump site -- often
Bennett Island, where exhausts are continually observed by U.S. weather
satellites.

      In the impulsive endothermic mode, energy is impulsively extracted
from the distant intersection zone. In the atmosphere this results in a
very sharp cooling or "cold explosion". It also reslts in the type of
boom and rumble often associated with thunder after a lightning bolt.

      On April 9, 1984 the Soviet Union tested such a "cold explosion"
off the coast of Japan, near the Kuril Islands. In the suddenly induced
low pressure "cold zone" above the ocean, ocean water was sharply sucked
up from the ocean, forming a dense cloud. Then air rushing into the low
pressure zone forced the cloud upward, forming a mushroom much like that
of an atomic explosion except for the absence of a flash and the absence
of a shockwave moving out and away from the center of the explosion.

      As the cloud rises, it expands by mixing -- very similar to a
giant thunderhead buildup, except much faster. In this case the cloud
rose to about 60,000 feet in about 2 minutes, spreading out until it
reached a diameter of about 200 miles. The incident was seen by the
pilots and crews of several Boeing 747 jet airliners in the general
vicinity. Sometime after that, a U.S. weather satellite photo of the
area occurred. The cloud in that photo has an anomalous density
distribution, differing from that of all other clouds in the area...


--TESLA'S "BIG EYE" FOR REMOTE VIEWING--

     Nikola Tesla planned a very special use for his endothermic scalar
interferometer. He planned to produce what he called his "big eye to see at a
distance."

     The system used to accomplish this is only weakly endothermic, so that
only a small amount of energy is extracted from the distant target. Also, the
beams are "scanned" by an open receiver, timewise, from side to side and top
to bottom. By scanning yet another single beam through the intersection zone
and phasing its pulses, an even better representation can be obtained. Thus
the receiver produces a representation of the energy extracted from various
locations within the distant endothermic zone. By displaying the received
signals on an appropriately scanned screen, a representation of the distant
scene can be created. This is a special kind of "micowve interferometry,"
and -- with modern techniques -- the imagery obtained can be surprisingly
good.

With development, it might even become as good as the image presently obtained
by side looking acquisition radars.

     Interestingly enough, since scalar beams will easily penetrate the earth
or the ocean, one can also look beneath the earth or ocean with this type of
scanning scalar interferometer.

     The importance of this capability to strategic and tactical
reconnaissance is obvious. Camouflage, cover, and concealment have no effect
on such a system. One can easily look into buildings and into underground
facilities. With a small system such as this, the U.S. Marines at Khe Sahn
would have had little difficulty locating the tunnels continually dug under
the perimeter by the Viet Cong. And targets under jungle canopies are directly
visible...

      It requires little imagination to see that this system is easily
adapted for use underwater. A type of "ndrwter radar." With such
devices, the problem posed by the underwater nuclear submarine is
solved. For example, an entire area can be continually searched, much
like acquisition radar systems do now. A submarine can be detected and
tracked, and none of its ordinary detectors will detect anything out of
the ordinary. By using a separate pair of beams in the exothermic mode,
powerful scalar pulses can be fired at the distant sub, intersecting at
the submarine in a violent EMP throughout the sub and its armament. Thus
the sub and all of its missiles are destroyed instantly.

      Or, continuous exothermic transmission can be used by the
targeting weapon at lesser power, gradually interfering with the sub's
electrical systems and causing it to loose control. The sub then sinks
to crush depths and implodes.

      Precisely that scenario seems to be what happened on April 10,
1963 to the U.S.S. Thresher nuclear submarine. It left a signature: the
subs nearby surface companion, the U.S.S. Skylark, was in the "splatter
zone" of the underwater scalar interference. That is, spurious EM noise
was being generated in all the Skylark's electrical systems, some of
which were actually disabled. So intense was the "electronic jamming"
that it required over an hour and a half for the Skylark to transmit an
emergency message back to its headquarters that the Thresher was n
serious trouble and contact with it had been lost. Some of the Skylark's
communication systems actually failed, but later resumed operation
inexplicably, once the jamming was gone. That type of "jamming" of
multiple bands and multiple electronic equipment, of course, together
with the anomalous failure of electronic equipment and its later
mysterious recovery, were direct signatures of the exothermic scalar
interferometer against thee undersea target in the vicinity of the
skylark.

      The very next day, April 11,1963, the same Soviet scalar EM
howitzer system was tested in the "destroy submarine" pulse mode. A huge
underwater EM blast occurred off the coast of Puerto Rico, about 100
miles north of the island. The underwater explosion caused a huge
boiling of the surface  of the ocean, followed by the rising up of a
giant mushroom of water about a third of a mile high, the mushroom of
water then fell back into the ocean, completing the signature.

      Fortunately the entire incident was seen by the startled crew of a
passing U.S. jetliner which was just passing its checkpoint in that
area. (See Robert J.Durant, "An underwater explosion -- or what?",
Pursuit, 5(2), April 1972, p. 30-31.)

      These two incidents were full up operational tests of Khrushchev's
newly-deployed superweapons. He probably staged this dramatic one-two
punch in a desperate effort to recover face with the Communist Party
after his disastrous face down by Kennedy in thee Cuban Missile Crisis a
few short months previously. Apparently the attempt was successful,
since he remained in power another year before being deposed.


--MUSHROOM CLOUD FROM SEA OFF JAPAN NEAR RUSSIAN TEST AREA--

      The following is concerning the "cold explosion" of April 9,1984.
The site of the explosion was only about 200 miles from downtown Tokyo.
It was seen by the crews of several jet airliners, including Japan Air
Lines Flight 36.

      A short time before the Soviets had hastily announced missile
tests would be conducted into a zone some distance away from the old
explosion site. This may have been a deception to cover this incident,
should any nation indicate they knew what was going on.

      It was also a direct "stimulus" to the Japanese and the rest of
the world: That is stimulate the system and see if the scientists
recognize what happened. If they do, then they know about scalar EM
weapons. If they don't, then their countries know nothing of scalar EM
weapons, and those countries are defenseless against them.

      At any rate, at about 5:14 a.m. Pacific Standard time on April
9,1984, a giant mushroom cloud erupted above the ocean south of the
Kuril Islands. The mushroom rose rapidly, expanding to an altitude of
60,000 feet and a diameter of 200 miles within 2 minutes.

      One pilot of a Boeing 747 who observed the cloud was a former B-52
bomber pilot. He described the cloud as being very similar to that of a
gigantic nuclear explosion, except there was no flash of visible light.
Taking evasive action, he turned off course away from the blast, and
braced for a blast shock that never came...


--MUSHROOM CLOUD RISING FROM THE SEA (COLD EXPLOSION)--

      Indeed, this highly anomalous cloud was due to a cold explosion -- a
test of a Soviet scalar EM howitzer in the pulsed endothermic mode.

      Thus a beautiful "stimulus" and test was conducted: quite a few
airliners were "pinged", providing a high-level stimulus to competent
observers. The news was sure to be reported by them to several nations. The
press was sure to pick up the story. This was a high order stimulus to see
whether the U.S., Japn, or other potential adversaries of the Soviet Union
recognized the testing of a cold explosion weapon.

      By our reaction, we assured them (with high confidence) that we still
knew nothing of scalar EM interferometry or cold explosions.

      Five Boeing 747's flew through or near the cloud on their way to
Anchorage Alaska. The aircraft were checked at Anchorage for radioactive
contamination, but nothing was found. This showed that the  huge explosion had
been non-nuclear.

      The ocean in the area is also about 21,000 feet deep. That is really too

deep for a submarine volcano to have erupted and caused the cloud. (Besides, a
volcano would have continued to snort at least a bit, and so that appears to
be out of the question as a cause of the incident.)

      In short, a man made phenomenon is indicated.

      Indeed, we know it was a cold explosion. In fact, the basic effect has
been produced over a dish of water in the laboratory, using a small scalar
interferometer in the endothermic mode.

      Further, the story does not end there.

      A geophysicist at the University of Hawaii, Dr.Daniel A. Walker,
together with his colleagues monitor an array of Hydrophones on the ocean
bottom, recording signals such as seismic events, volcano eruptions, etc.

      Dr.Walker and his colleagues performed a comprehensive analysis of the
data recorded by the hydrophones in and around the time of the incident in
question. The data shows the absence of any natural seismic or volcanic event
that could have caused the April 9th phenomenon off the coast of Japan.

      He and his colleagues concluded that it was either an as yet unknown
natural phenomenon, or a man made phenomenon.

      Their report is published in "Science". (D.Walker,"Kaitoku Seamount and
the Mystery Cloud of 9 April 1984," Science, 227(4687),Feb.8,1985,p. 607-611.)


--THE TESLA SHIELD--

      Of particular interest is the hemispherical shell of energy which years
ago was dubbed the "Tesla Shield."

      Two scalar hemispherical surfaces are created, using multiple frequency
transmitters and truncated Fourier series expansions. Interference of the two
scalar hemispheres creates a great, glowing hemispherical shell of ordinary
electromagnetic energy. In the shell, the energy density is sufficient to lift
Dirac matter from the Dirac sea of vacuum. The shell is thus filled with a
glowing plasma.

      Such a shell may be several hundreds of miles in diameter at the base.
The enormous energy required to form such a defense shell is obtained by a
"scalar power tap" into the molten core of the earth itself as previously
explained. In late April /early May of 1985, 27 such "power taps" were placed
in the earth by the Soviets. If each tap is capable of powering 4 to 6 large
scalar EM weapons, then the Soviet strategic scalar EM arsenal contains over
100 monstrous superweapons capable of generating exothermic explosions,
endothermic explosions, engineering the weather, locating and destroying
underwater submarines, detecting and destroying ballistic missiles shortly
after launch, detecting and destroying long range strategic bombers as soon as
they are airborne, etc.

      At any rate, the giant Tesla shield is useful against any penetrating
vehicle. If the shell is not so large, its energy density may be very high. In
that case, the intense plasma heating will fuse and even vaporize metallic
bodies. In addition, any vehicle encountering the shell is subjected to an
extremely intense EMP arising everywhere inside its circuitry. EMP shielding
is
of no use against the creation of energy throughout the spacetime of the
circuits; such shielding only helps against energy flow through space in the
conventional sense.

      Thus the electronics of any vehicle encountering the shield are
instantly dudded, whether or not they are shielded against ordinary
electromagnetic interference (EMI). This includes the electronics operating a
nuclear warhead, carried by a re-entry vehicle. Electrically everything
penetrating the shell is totally dudded. Further, explosive materials are
exploded when such an EMP is encountered, and combustible materials are
fiercely consumed or set afire. Ablative shielding suffers an interesting
catastrophe: since energy does not try to "flow into" the shielding but
"arises" everywhere in it simultaneously, "ablation" occurs everywhere
throughout the ablative material, simply exploding it instantly. Inaddition,
for smaller Tesla shells (say of 50 miles in diameter) the energy density is
sufficient to melt or vaporize metals such as missile structures.

       With such a Tesla shield, there is no need to discriminate true warhead
bearing re-entry vehicles from decoys, chaff, etc. The whole "mess" entering
the shield is simply "cleaned up" and "sterilized" or destroyed. The shield
can take care of ICBMs/IRBMs and their nuclear warheads, strategic bombers and
their nuclear bombs, cruise missiles and their nuclear warheads, re-entry
vehicles and their warheads, decoys, chaff, etc.


--SARYSHAGAN DIRECTION-SEPTEMBER 1979--

       The London Sunday Times of 17 August 1980 contained information
and a photo-sketch of incidents of sighting of the testing of very large
Tesla globes deep within the Soviet Union. The sightings were made in
Afghanistan by British war cameraman Nick Downie. The phenomena seen
were in the direction of the Saryshagan Missile Test Range, which --
according to the U.S. Defense Departments "Soviet Military Power," 1986
-- contains one or more large directed energy weapons (DEW's).

       Even though Downie was seeing the globe of light from a great
distance, it flared silently over the Hindu Kush and expanded to subtend
an arc of about 20 degrees, dimming as it expanded. (An arc of 20
degrees subtended by an object many hundreds of miles distant indicates
an object of well over a hundred miles in diameter. This gives some idea
of the enormous energy being controlled and manipulated by these Soviet
weapons.)

       Downie saw the sight on more than one occasion in September 1979.

       In the same month --December 1979-- a stationary luminous globe
containing a vertical stripe of black in the center was seen in the sky
off the coast of St. Petersburg, Florida. This particular type of
sighting in that area has been previously correlated with times of known
activity at Saryshagan.

       Further, in the same month, U.S. nuclear warning Vela satellites
detected a "nuclear flash" over the South Atlantic, off the coast of
Africa. Controversy has raged in U.S. Intelligence and scientific
circles to this day as to whether a nuclear explosion or some other kind
of mechanism produced the flash.

       Indeed, the flash may have been produced by a scalar EM howitzer
from Saryshagan as one more "ping" of the U.S. Intelligence system, to
ascertain whether or not it knew anything about scalar EM howitzers.
Again the negative response told them with high confidence that (1) We
still didn't know about scalar EM stuff, and (2) We were still totally
defenseless against the Soviet scalar EM weaponry.

       At any rate, from Downie's sightings, it is highly probable that
the DEW weaponry at Saryshagan Missile Test Range was active in
September 1979, and was producing large Tesla globes. If the DEWs at
Saryshagan can produce the giant luminous Tesla globe, they are almost
certainly scalar EM interferometers and can produce the giant Tesla
shields as well. Downie reported other earlier sightings of similar
phenomena seen by Afghans deep within the Soviet Union in the same
direction toward Saryshagan...

       Briefly, let us cover the uses of such a giant globe or spherical
shell of glowing EM energy and plasma.

       By placing such a giant globe hundreds of miles out away from the
defended heartland, an entire arc of the sky can be defended against
long range ballistic missile attack in mid-course. During their mid-course
trajecr, the attacking missiles would have to penetrate the globular
shell twice, exposing them to giant internal EMPs twice. A very high
probability thus exists that all missiles entering the space occupied by
the globe are dudded upon entry and/or exit. This includes the
electronics inside the nuclear warheads themselves. Also this is
particularly effective against MIRV and MARV missile carriers since the
multiple re-entry vehicles are normally still on the main vehicle during
most of mid-course. The use of this mid-course ABM globe defense greatly
reduces the number of vehicles arriving at the latter part of mid-course
and the terminal phase of their trajectory.

       By using a smaller, more intense globe, and placing it on
incoming clusters of objects or single objects, both EMP and local
heating are used against the objects. This is suitable in the latter
part of mid-course and in the terminal phase of ICBMs, IRBMs, SLBMs, and
cruise missiles. It is also useful against incoming strategic bombers
and their air to surface missiles both ballistic and cruise.

       Two modes of the globes -- especially the small ones -- can be
used. First the continuous mode can be used to "fry" or vaporize
incoming objects in a relatively small volume (say ten to fifteen miles
in diameter). Second, the "pulse" mode can be used to "service" all
incoming objects, whether or not they have passed through the "large
globe" mid-course defense. This provides an additional guarantee of
killing the objects; discrimination is not require, just get all of
them. The exposure of all incoming objects to multiple attacks raises
the probability of kill to essentially 100%, or as close to that as one
wishes. Of course the incoming vehicle may still encounter a terminal
defense consisting of the Tesla shield and associated roving "quickshot"
small intense globes.

       In short, with these systems an essentially 100% ABM and
antibomber defense is possible. Further, the Soviets have possessed such
an effective dfesefor two decades, JUST AS THEY HAVE OPENLY STATED
SINCE 1960 WHEN KHRUSHCHEV ANNOUNCED HIS "SUPERWEAPONS"!!




--CONTINUOUS TESLA EMP GLOBE--

       Here is another verified incident of a gigantic test of a Soviet
scalar EM howitzer deep within the Soviet Union.

       This is a C.I.A. report, released under the Freedom of
Information Act.

One can be quite sure that the incident occurred as stated.

   The phenomenon was seen from two aircraft approaching Mehrabad
Airport in Teheran, Iran on June 17, 1966 and reported by their pilots.

       On the far horizon deep within the Soviet Union, an intense
spherical ball of light appeared, "sitting on the horizon" so to speak.
The globe of light increased to enormous size, dimming as it did so,
literally filling an arc of the distant sky as it expanded. The sighting
was shielded from most ground observers view at the airport itself due
to an intervening mountain range which masked most of the phenomena from
the ground.

       The silent, expanding globe was observed for four or five minutes
before it faded away.

       Again this is positive evidence of the testing of a giant scalar
interferometer, in the "mid-course ABM globe" type of action.

       However, note the date -- mid 1966! The Soviets have therefore
been testing such scalar weapons of enormous size and power for at least
two decades. This implies that development must have started at least a
decade earlier, or in the mid '50s.

       Still earlier, in January 1960 Nikita Khrushchev had announced
the development of a "fantastic" Soviet weapon, one which could even
destroy all life on earth if unrestrainedly used. In 1962 the ebullient
Khrushchev was forced to back down and lose face before John Kennedy, in
the Cuban Missile Crisis. Khrushchev's missiles and bombers were in
woeful shape, as Kennedy well knew (by courtesy of the Russian spy,
Colonel Oleg Penkovsky). Kennedy did not know that Khrushchev's new
superweapons were nearing deployment, but were not quite ready yet.

       To save face and prevent his immediate ouster, Khrushchev
apparently conducted a startling two-strike demonstration of his new
weapons as soon as they became operationally ready. On April 10, 1963 he
detected and destroyed the U.S.S. Thresher nuclear submarine, using a
scalar EM howitzer in the underwater "continuous" mode. The next day he
demonstrated the "pulsed" underwater destruction mode for underwater
subs by producing a giant underwater explosion underneath the water 100
miles north of Puerto Rico. Ironically, just as the Atlantic was coming
alive with U.S. naval vessels searching for the lost Thresher, a second
test of the weapons that had finished off the sub occurred to the south
of them, unnoticed and disregarded, even though seen and reported to he
F.B.I. and the U.S. Coast Guard by a passing U.S. jetliner's pilot and
crew, who observed the underwater explosion.

        We thus can peg the development of these weapons by the Soviets
as starting well before 1960. The first operational deployment of the
gigantic strategic weaponry occurred in early 1963.

        Note that the 1966 testing observed here is completely
consistent with this estimated development schedule.

        Thus large Soviet strategic scalar EM weapons have been
operational on site for 24 YEARS !!! This implies that at least three
additional generations of the scalar EM weapons have been developed and
deployed by now...



--MYSTERIOUS LIGHT OVER NORTH PACIFIC--

        Incidents of Soviet testing of the Tesla shield and the Tesla
globe weapons are routinely observed  by airline pilots flying over the
North Pacific into and out of Japan.

        This is one typical example. Two jetliners, Japan Air Lines
flights 403 and 421, sighted and reported a large glowing globe of light
sitting just beyond the horizon and extending well above it. The
aircraft were in the vicinity of 42 degrees N latitude and 153 degrees
longitude at the time. The sighting was thus about 700 miles east of
Kushiro.

        The diameter of the ball was estimated as at least 18-27
kilometers by the pilots. Depending upon the actual distance to the
sphere it may have been of much larger size.

        This incident is reported in the Asahi Evening News, Tokyo, June
22, 1982.

        Many similar sightings have been reported by jet airliner pilots
flying over these waters.


--WHITE SPHERE SEEN IN NORTH ATLANTIC 1976--

        Here is another sighting closer to home.

        This incident was observed from a passing ship on June 22,1976 in the
North Atlantic, at about 2113-2140 hours. It is reported in the Marine
Observer, Vol.47,1977, p.66.

        First an orange glow was sighted behind some distant clouds. A couple
of minutes later, a glowing white sphere of light was observed to the left of
the orange glow, just above the clouds. The white sphere then slowly expanded
to a much larger sphere, dimming as it expanded. At its maximum size, the top
of the white sphere reached about 24 degrees 30 minutes elevation angle to the
observer. Development to maximum size required about 10 minutes.

        By 2140 hours the sphere had faded and disappeared. The sphere was
sufficiently thin that the stars could be seen through  it at all times.

        Again, this incident strong<y fits the large Tesla globe mode of a
Soviet scalar EM interferometer.

        The significance and role of the orange glow are not known at this
time.


--CONTINUOUS TESLA FIREBALL--

        Here is another incident that represents a stimulus to the British
government, to see if the British are aware of scalar electromagnetics.

        Again this is a CIA report released under the Freedom of Information
Act, so the details are reliable.

        On Sep. 10, 1976 British European Airways flight 831, flying between
Moscow and London and over Lithuania at the time, observed an intense ball
of light above the clouds below the aircraft. The light was so intens it
lit up the sky in the entire vicinity.

        The concerned pilot reported the glowing object to Soviet ground
authorities with whom he was in contact. He received harsh instructions to
ignore the light, and essentially to continue on his way out of there.

      Here we see an incident involving a small, intense Tesla globe, of the
kind with which the defense could "service" objects that had already
penetrated a large mid-course globe, or aircraft approaching the defended
area.

        Obviously the Soviet authorities were tracking the aircraft, and knew
it was in the vicinity. It seems logical, then, that they deliberately
placed the brightly glowing ball beneath the aircraft so that the pilot and
crew could not fail to observe it.

        The strange message to the pilot was simply designed to increase the
intensity of the stimulus. The stimulus was to be something like, "The
Soviets are doing something in research and development that allows them to
create intense balls of glowing light at a distance, and place these objects
in and around the air in and around aircraft, possibly to intercept them."
The purpose, of course, was to observe the British governments reaction
after the incident was reported by the pilot upon his arrival in London.

        Again the reaction of the British -- and the U.S. as well -- was as
predicted. Again we showed that we knew nothing of scalar electromagnetic
weapons, and did not recognize one when we encountered its effects.






--TERMINAL ABM SYSTEM--

      Very neat things can be done if one "nests" several Tesla shields
-- say three or four -- concentrically, one inside the other. In that
case even the nuclear radiation (such as gamma rays) from a
defense-suppressive high altitude nuclear burst can be handled.

     For example, suppose three such concentric shields are placed over
a large vital area. Further, suppose a high altitude nuclear burst is
placed above the outer shield. Gamma radiation almost instantl srikes
the plasma in the outer shell, where it is absorbed, scattered, and
re-radiated at a lower temperature. (That after all is what plasmas do.)
Inside the first shell, the scattered radiation is now in the x-ray and
ultra violet region. Let us track the most lethal component, the x-rays.

     The scattered x-rays then strike the second plasma shell, and are
absorbed scattered and re-radiated at a lower temperature. Inside the
second shell the scattered radiation is now in the visible and infrard
region, with a little ultraviolet.

     This optical radiation in turn strikes the third plasma shell, and
is absorbed scattered and re-radiated at still lower temperature. Inside
the third shell, most of the energy is now in the form of radio
frequency (RF) energy, with a little AIR and visible band spectral energy
content.

     At this point, ordinary electromagnetic interference (EMI)
shielding of electronic equipment on the ground inside the third shield
can take care of any RF interferece resulting from the emergent RF
noise.

     As can be seen, three shells are sufficient to convert the gamma
and x-ray radiation (and ultraviolet and infrared) mostly to harmless RF
energy before all three shells are penetrated. Thus the tactic of
deliberate defense suppression by a preliminary high altitude nuclear
burst can be countered by multiple Tesla shields.

     In addition, of course, any ordinary vehicles penetrating all three
shields are exposed to successive violent EMP's and are almost certainly
electrically dudded. The vehicles are also subjected to multiple periods
of intense heating, so combustibles, fuels, explosives, and ablatives
are destroyed. In addition, metal structures may be melted or vaporized.

     Think of it this way: anything which hits one of these Tesla
shields goes phhht! Just like a bug hitting an electrified bug killer
screen.

     For years passing ships have observed and reported such
multiple-shield "light phenomena" over remote regions of the ocean. U.S.
Intelligence has routinely not paid any heed to "lights at night" over
remote ocean areas, and so Soviet tests in this manner have remained
relatively unnoticed by officialdom...



--WOODPECKER BEAMS INTERSECT OVER NORTH AMERICA--

     In July 1976 the U.S. received very special Bicentennial greetings
from the Soviet Union.

     At that time, communications systems of the world in the 3-30
megaHertz band suddenly met substantial interference from extremely
powerful, chirped Soie tanmitters which were suddenly activated.
These transmitters continue their transmission to this day.

     Estimates of the power of these transmitters vary, but figures
range as high as several hundred megawatts, with a nominal figure being
100 megawatts.

     These powerful transmitters were properly nicknamed "Woodpeckers"
because of the characteristic sound of the chirped signal when received.
That is, the received signal makes a "pecking" sound much like a
woodpecker's beak hitting a block of wood.

     Several nations protested, but the powerful signals have cotinued,
right down to this day. The only Soviet response was to add a "spread
spectrum" capability, so that the transmitter would not dwell too long
on one specific frequency, but shifted periodically to other
frequencies.

     These transmitters have apparently never been precisely located by
U.S. intelligence, but their beams carry much of the characteristics of
an over-the-horizon (OTH) radar. They have been dubbed OTH radars by
U.S. intelligence, and can without question perform that mission, in
addition to some very interesting missions that U.S. intelligence does
not assess.

     "Soviet Military Power", Department of Defense, 1985, p.45 shows
the direct intersection over the United States of the Woodpecker radar
beams used in an OTH role. In addition, shown is an additional "scanner"
beam which can be scanned across the intersection "grid" over the U.S.,
formed by waveform interference of two main Woodpecker beams.

     First, they can be used in  a conventional OTH radar mode, since
their beams follow the earth-ionosphere waveguide and curve around the
earth. In this mode they can detect missiles at launch and thereafter,
and strategic bombers at launch and thereafter.

     These scalar interference grid weapons can be used to biologically
attack entire populations in a targeted area. This aspect is not covered
in this briefing. Suffice it to say that phase locked ELF modulation
signals of 10 Hz and less are often detected on multiple woodpecker
frequencies simultaneously. In a target area, this modulation -- is
sufficiently stronger than the Schumann resonance of the earth's
magnetic field -- will entrain a percentage of the brains into "forced
entrainment". In that case, these human brains are "synchronized" to the
Woodpecker signals so that multiple coherent frequencies are
phase-locked into them. That is, multiple coherent EM channels directly
into these entrained brains now exist. At that point, Fourier expansions
may now be used to attack specific portions of the brain geometrically.

     In addition, scalar EM disease patterns can be modulated upon the
carriers, again with Fourier expansions. Specific biological effects can
be induced in the entrained populations at will, limited only by the
state of the art of the Soviet technology used to attack them. Possible
effects include instantaneous death, heart seizure, severe emotional
disruption, loss of control of internal functions, diseases, disabling
of the immune system, and even implantation of thoughts, emotions, and
ideas which are interpreted by the subjects as their own.

     While further discussion of this area is beyond the scope of my
knowledge, the biological aspects of the Woodpecker transmitters are
horrible. It suffices to say that, in thousands of experiments,
Kaznacheyev demonstrated that almost any kind of cellular death and
disease pattern could be electromagnetically transmitted. Kaznacheyev
reported the effect in the near ultraviolet.  Experimenters at the
University of Mar burg in West Germany duplicated the experiments in the
infrared.

     The bottom line is that photons themselves can carry death and
disease patterns between cells. Scalar EM technology allows synthesis of
the actual potential pattern (which after all represents total control
of charge and charge distribution, hence biochemistry in the cell) of a
particular disease or death mechanism. Symptoms (and cellular death from
them!) of nuclear radiation, chemical poisoning, bacterial infection,
and other mechanisms were induced by the Kaznacheyev experiments.

     Dr. Popp of West Germany has published an analysis of the virtual
photon master control system of the cells. Since scalar EM represents
the deliberate ordering of virtual particle  flux into deterministic
patterns, the master control system can readily be entered with scalar
techniques to induce disease and disorder at will...
-------
<EOF>

