












                           Appendix F
                                
                     Affidavit of Rescission








































                        Page F - 1 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


Reader's Notes:























































                        Page F - 2 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


Certified Mail Number: __________________________________________

                 Date: __________________________________________

John Q. Doe
c/o Post Office Box [##]
Marin County
San Rafael, California Republic
united States of America


                NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND
                                
               PUBLIC NOTICE RESCISSION AFFIDAVIT
                                
                         OF JOHN Q. DOE
                                
                                
CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC   )
                            )        Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                )


                            PREAMBLE
                                
     I, State  Citizen John Q. Doe, being a free Sovereign adult,
natural born  in Massachusetts,  living and  working as  a  State
Citizen domiciled in the California Republic since 1952 and I, as
such status,  hereby make  this Special Appearance, by Affidavit,
in Propria  Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, At Law, in Common Law,
with Assistance,  Special, neither  conferring nor  consenting to
any  foreign  jurisdiction,  except  to  the  judicial  power  of
California and/or  America, and  as such  I willfully enforce all
Constitutional  limitations   respectively  on   all   government
agencies when  dealing with  them.   Wherefore,  the  undersigned
Affiant, named  herein and  above, upon  affirmation declares and
evidences the following:

     I, John  Q. Doe,  am of  lawful age  and competent.   I am a
Sovereign natural  born  free  State  Citizen  domiciled  in  the
California Republic  (see 2:1:5  in the  U.S. Constitution),  and
thereby in  the united  States of  America, in  fact, by right of
heritage, a  Sovereign State  Citizen inhabiting and domiciled in
the California  Republic, protected  via hereditary succession by
my predecessors'  previous contracts  with government as found in
the Northwest  Ordinance of  1787, the  Organic Act  of 1849, the
original   Constitution    of   California,   the   Articles   of
Confederation of  1777, the Constitution for the united States of
America (1787)  including its  Preamble, and  the Bill  of Rights
(1791) including  its Preamble;   and,  as such,  I retain all my
unalienable rights  granted by  God in  positive law, embodied in
the Declaration  of Independence  (1776) and  binding rights upon
myself and  my parentage,  on this  day and  for all time now and
hereafter.  And further,


                        Page F - 3 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


     I, John Q. Doe, a Sovereign natural born free State Citizen,
in  Propria   Persona,  proceeding   Sui  Juris,   At  Law,  with
Assistance, Special, receiving mail c/o Post Office Box [##], San
Rafael, California  Republic, being  duly sworn  and affixing  my
signature  to   this  document,  do  hereby  make  the  following
statement of  fact and  affirm:   the so-called "Social Security"
number 123-45-6789  is rescinded  in application,  in body and in
signature, for  I affirm  that this agreement was imposed upon me
by usage  of threat, coercion, withholding of material facts, and
uninformed consent,  and that  I was  not  at  age  of  majority;
therefore,  this  aforementioned  government  action  constitutes
constructive fraud  and  placed  me  under  duress  of  mind  and
therefore deprived  me of  giving any  meaningful consent  to the
original "Social  Security"  application  and  agreement.    This
agreement is  null and  void, ab initio (from its inception), due
to the aforementioned fraud.  And further,


              AFFIDAVIT AMENDMENT PROTECTION CLAUSE
                                
     I, the  undersigned, in  order  to  protect  my  unalienable
rights to  life, liberty  and property,  inclusive of my right to
the proper  in rem and in personam State Citizenship status, have
been forced  to amend certain legal documents and statements, due
to the  continued  revelation  and  increased  discovery  of  the
continuous acts  of fraud  upon me  by the  de facto governments,
both State and Federal, and therefore I declare that I am now and
fully intend  to remain  free to amend any and all such documents
and statements, as a matter of substantive right, for I cannot be
held liable  for either  the acts or the omissions by governments
which are  out of my control, which acts and omissions constitute
fraud in  one form or another.  Therefore, I proceed at all times
"WITH EXPLICIT  RESERVATION OF  ALL  MY  UNALIENABLE  RIGHTS  AND
WITHOUT PREJUDICE  TO ANY OF MY UNALIENABLE RIGHTS", inclusive of
my personal  right to  substantive  and  procedural  due  process
proceedings under  the Judicial  Power of  both my  State and  my
Nation.  And further,


     I, John Q. Doe, do state and affirm the following:

     1.   That material  facts were  withheld, such  as Title 28,
U.S.C., Section  1746, Subsections 1 & 2 (being within or without
the "United  States"), which  caused me  to  be  unaware  that  a
completed, signed  and  submitted  "Form  1040"  or  "income  tax
return" and  other Internal  Revenue Service  and State Franchise
Tax  Board   forms  and   documents  are   voluntarily   executed
instruments which  could be  used as prima facie evidence against
me in  criminal trials  and civil  proceedings to show that I had
voluntarily waived  my Constitutionally secured rights and that I
had voluntarily  subjected myself  to the  federal  income/excise
tax, to  the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter
referred to  as the IRC), to the authority of the State Franchise
Tax Board  (hereinafter referred  to  as  the  FTB)  and  to  the


                        Page F - 4 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


authority of  the Internal  Revenue Service (hereinafter referred
to as the IRS) by signing and thereby affirming, under penalty of
perjury (within  the "United  States"), that  I was, in effect, a
"person" subject  to the  tax;   that the  above  induced  and/or
forced  action,   via  State  and  Federal  governments,  clearly
indicates a  violation of Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (1:9:3),
to wit:   "No  Bill of  Attainder or  ex post  facto Law shall be
passed" and  also Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 (1:9:4), to wit:
"No Capitation,  or other  direct, Tax  shall be  laid, unless in
Proportion to  the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore directed to
be taken"  in the  United States  Constitution.  These above same
injunctions are  found in  the Northwest  Ordinance  and  in  the
California Constitution.  And further,

     2.   That material  facts were  withheld, which caused me to
be unaware  of the legal effects of signing and filing income tax
returns, as  shown by  the decision of the United States Court of
Appeals for  the 9th  Circuit in  the 1974  ruling in the case of
Morse vs U.S., 494 F.2d 876, 880, wherein the Court explained how
a State  Citizen became  a "taxpayer"  by stating:  "Accordingly,
when returns  were filed in Mrs. Morse's name declaring income to
her for  1944 and 1945, making her potentially liable for the tax
due on  that income,  she became a taxpayer within the meaning of
the Internal Revenue Code." [emphasis added]  And further,

     3.   That material  facts were  withheld, which caused me to
be unaware  that the  signing and  filing of an income tax return
and other  IRS forms  are acts  of  voluntary  compliance  for  a
Sovereign natural  born free  State Citizen inhabiting the united
States of  America, when executed and submitted by said Sovereign
living and  working within  the States  of the Union;  that I was
unaware that,  in a  legislative court  such as  a United  States
District Court,  the completed  IRS documents  can  become  prima
facie evidence,  sufficient to  sustain a  legal conclusion  by a
judge,  that  the  signer  has  voluntarily  changed  his  lawful
status/state FROM  that of  a Sovereign  natural born  free State
Citizen who  is not  subject to  any federal  income tax  and who
possesses all  of his  God-given, Constitutionally secured rights
when dealing with government, TO the legal status of a "taxpayer"
(any individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company
or corporation  subject  to  federal  excise  tax),  that  is,  a
"person" who  is subject  to  the  federal  excise  tax  and  is,
therefore, subject  to the authority, jurisdiction and control of
the federal  government under Title 26 of the United States Code,
to the statutes governing federal taxation and to the regulations
of the IRS, thereby imposing the tax on himself, waiving his God-
given Constitutionally  secured rights  to property  and labor in
respect to  the federal  income/excise  tax  statutes  and  their
administration by  the IRS,  and establishing  himself as one who
has privileges only, but no rights, in dealings with the IRS, the
same as  a corporation;   that  it is  my understanding  that the
change of status/state resulting from the signed IRS documents is
very similar to the change of status that occurs when one enlists
in the  military service  and  voluntarily  takes  an  oath  that


                        Page F - 5 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


subjects him  to the  authority, jurisdiction  and control of the
federal government  under Title 10 of the United States Code, the
statutes governing  the armed  forces and  the regulations of the
military service, thereby waiving his Constitutionally guaranteed
rights in  relation to  dealings with the military services.  And
further,

     4.   That I,  as a Sovereign natural born free State Citizen
and inhabitant  in the united States of America, domiciled in the
California Republic,  and as a Free Man, am endowed by my Creator
with numerous  unalienable/inalienable rights  which include  but
are not limited to my rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness (property)",  which rights  are specifically identified
in the  Magna Carta  (1215) and  the Declaration  of Independence
(1776), and  protected and  secured by  the Constitution  for the
united States  of America  (1789)  and  the  subsequent  Bill  of
Rights, Articles  in  Amendment  1  thru  10  (1791);    that  my
birthright to  the "life,  liberty and  the pursuit of happiness"
has been  interpreted by both the Framers of the Constitution and
by the  U.S. Supreme  Court to  include my  unalienable right  to
contract, to  acquire, to  deal in,  to sell,  rent, and exchange
properties  of   various  kinds,   real  and   personal,  without
requesting  or   exercising  any   privilege  or  franchise  from
government;   that I have learned that these unalienable property
rights also  include my  right to contract for the exchange of my
labor-property for  other properties  and remuneration,  such  as
wages,  salaries,   and  other  earnings;    that  I  have  never
knowingly, intentionally  or  voluntarily  waived  any  of  these
unalienable rights,  nor can  I, John  Q. Doe, be forced to waive
any of  these rights  granted to me by God the Father, my Creator
(see Brady  vs U.S.,  397 U.S.  742 at  748 (1970)), because I am
endowed with  these rights  by my  Creator and by nobody else and
nothing else.  And further,

     5.   That I  understand that,  if the  exercise of my rights
were subjected  to taxation, these same rights could be destroyed
by increasing  the tax  rates to unaffordable levels;  therefore,
courts  have  repeatedly  ruled  that  government  has  no  power
whatsoever to tax or otherwise "lien" against the exercise of any
rights, particularly  the rights  of Sovereign State Citizens, as
shown by  the United  States Supreme Court in the case of Murdock
vs Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), which stated:  "A state may
not impose  a charge  for the enjoyment of a right granted by the
Federal Constitution.";    that  unalienable  rights  are  rights
against which  no lien  can be established precisely because they
are un-a-lien-able;   that America's founding documents enumerate
some of  my unalienable  rights, none of which rights I have ever
waived knowingly,  voluntarily and  intentionally;  that I freely
choose to  obey all  American Law  and to pay all Lawful taxes in
jurisdictions which  are applicable  to me  for the  common good;
that I  stand in  Propria Persona with Assistance, Special;  that
my status  and unalienable  rights, as  stated hereinafter and in
the foregoing, are not negotiable.  And further,



                        Page F - 6 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


     6.   That, for  years past and at least since the year 1964,
I have  been influenced by numerous cases of people going to jail
and being  punished, and  also by  numerous and  repeated  public
warnings made  by the  FTB and by the IRS, via radio, television,
the printed  press and other forms of public communication media,
warning of  the "deadline"  for filing  State and  Federal forms,
such as  a "Form  1040 Income  Tax Return" and/or other IRS forms
and documents;  this therefore caused me to file said forms under
threat, duress and coercion.  And further,

     7.   That, in  addition to  the aforesaid  warnings, I  have
also been  influenced by  the misleading and deceptive wording of
IRS publications and IRS-generated news articles, by the pressure
of widespread  rumors and  misinformed public opinion, and by the
advice  and  assurances  of  lawyers,  C.P.A.'s  and  income  tax
preparers which  misled me  to believe  incorrectly that the 16th
Amendment to  the Constitution  for the  united States of America
abolished the  Fifth Amendment  of  that  same  Constitution  and
authorized Congress to impose a direct tax on me, my property, my
exchanges of  property and/or  property received  as a  result of
exercising my Constitutionally secured right to contract;  that I
was further  misled into  believing that  I had  a legal duty and
obligation to  file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return" and other IRS
and State  tax forms,  schedules and  documents, and  that I  was
unaware of 28 U.S.C. 1746, wherein there are two perjury clauses,
one stating  that you  are within  the "United  States"  and  one
stating that  you are  without the  "United States".  The perjury
clauses on  both State  and Federal  tax forms  stipulate,  under
penalty of perjury, that I was stating unknowingly, involuntarily
and unintentionally  that I was within the "United States".  This
is an  act of  fraud by  both State  and Federal taxing agencies.
And further,

     8.   That I  have also  been further  influenced, misled and
alarmed by  rumors, by  misinformed public  opinion  and  by  the
advice  and  assurances  of  lawyers,  C.P.A.'s  and  income  tax
preparers to  the effect that "the IRS and the FTB will get you",
and  that  it  would  be  a  crime  punishable  by  fines  and/or
imprisonment if  I did not fill out, sign and file with the IRS a
"Form 1040";   that,  in point  of fact, the only person actually
named within  the IRC  as a  person required to collect an income
tax, to  file an  income tax return and to pay an income tax is a
"Withholding Agent";  and that, to the best of my knowledge, I am
not now,  nor have  I ever  been  a  "Withholding  Agent".    And
further,

     9.   That, in  addition to  all of  the  reasons  stated  in
paragraphs 6,  7 and  8 above, I was influenced by the common and
widespread  practice   of  employers  who,  either  knowingly  or
unknowingly, without  Power of  Attorney,  misled  me  and  their
employees to  believe that they and I must have a Social Security
Number and  that all  are subject  to the  withholding of "income
taxes"  from   their  earnings,  either  with  or  without  their
permission,  based   upon  the   employers'   possibly   mistaken


                        Page F - 7 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


assumption that  they, as  employers,  are  required  by  law  to
withhold "income  taxes" from  the paychecks  of their employees,
which is  contrary to  the Sections 3402(n), 7343 and 7701(a)(16)
of the  IRC, absent  a  voluntary  execution  of  Form  W-4,  the
"Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate".  And further,

     10.  That  I   have  also  been  mistakenly  influenced  and
mistakenly impressed by annual public displays and indiscriminate
public offerings  by the  IRS and  the FTB of large quantities of
the Forms  1040 and 540 in banks, in post offices and through the
U.S.  mail,  which  public  displays  and  indiscriminate  public
offerings also had the effect of reminding me of, and inducing me
to respond  mistakenly by  filling out, signing and sending "Form
1040" to the IRS and "Form 540" to the FTB.  And further,

     11.  That said  "Forms 1040"  contained no  reference to any
law or  laws which  would explain  just exactly who is and who is
not subject  to, or liable for, the income tax, State or Federal,
nor did  it contain  any notice  or warning to anyone that merely
sending said  completed "Form  1040" to  the IRS  would waive  my
right to  privacy, as  secured by  the 4th  Amendment in the U.S.
Constitution, and also waive my right to not be a witness against
myself, as secured by the 5th Amendment in the U.S. Constitution,
and that  a completed  "Form 1040"  would, in  itself, constitute
legal evidence,  admissible in  a court of law, that the filer is
subject to  and liable for the income/excise tax, even though and
regardless of  the fact  that I, as a Sovereign natural born free
State Citizen,  am  actually  and  legally  not  subject  to  the
statutory  jurisdiction   of  Title   26,  nor   liable  for  any
income/excise tax,  and regardless  of the fact that, to the best
of my knowledge, I have no legal duty or obligation whatsoever to
complete and  file any "Form 1040" or State income tax forms, nor
did they ever evidence 28 U.S.C. 1746.  And further,

     12.  That at  no time was I ever notified or informed by the
IRS or  by the State of California, nor by any of their agents or
employees, nor  by any  lawyer, C.P.A.,  or tax  preparer, of the
fact that  the so-called 16th Amendment in the U.S. Constitution,
as correctly  interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in such cases
as Brushaber vs Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916) and
Stanton vs Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916), identified the
income tax  as an  indirect excise tax in accordance with Article
1, Section 8, Clause 1 (1:8:1) of the United States Constitution;
that the  so-called 16th  Amendment to  the U.S. Constitution, as
correctly  interpreted  by  the  U.S.  Supreme  Court,  does  not
authorize  a   tax  on  all  individuals  but  is  applicable  to
nonresident  aliens   (e.g.,  Frank  R.  Brushaber)  who  involve
themselves in activities, events or occupations which come under,
or are  within, the  taxing authority  of the "United States", as
explained in  Treasury Decision 2313, dated March 21, 1916;  that
the so-called  16th Amendment  was never  actually  ratified  nor
could  it  have  been  enacted  into  positive  law  because  the
requisite number  of States  (i.e., 36)  did not  meet the lawful
requirements for  amending the  Constitution at  that time;   and


                        Page F - 8 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


that a mass of incontrovertible material evidence available since
the year  1985 proves  that the  act of "declaring" the so-called
16th Amendment  "ratified"  was  an  act  of  outright  fraud  by
Philander C. Knox in the year 1913.  And further,

     13.  That at  no time was I ever notified or informed by the
FTB nor by the IRS, their agents or employees, nor by any lawyer,
C.P.A. or  tax preparer,  of the  fact that,  because of  various
rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in such cases as Flint vs Stone
Tracy Co.,  220 U.S. 107 (1911), and Pollock vs Farmer's Loan and
Trust Co.,  157 U.S.  492 (1895),  the  indirect  excise  tax  on
incomes identified  by the so-called 16th Amendment is also a tax
upon corporate  privileges granted  by government,  which tax  is
measured by  the amount of corporate income (see Corporations Tax
Act, Statutes  at Large, 1909, vol. XXXVI, section 38, page 112);
that this  indirect excise  tax is  also imposed  on the  taxable
income of  foreign corporations,  and on  the taxable  income  of
nonresident aliens  to the  extent this (latter) income is either
effectively connected  with the  conduct of  a trade  or business
within the  corporate jurisdiction  of the  "United  States",  or
derived from  sources within  the corporate  jurisdiction of  the
"United States"  although  not  effectively  connected  with  the
conduct of trade or business within the corporate jurisdiction of
the "United  States", according  to Sections  871 and  872 of the
IRC.  And further,

     14.  That my attention has been called to Report No. 80-19A,
entitled "Some  Constitutional Questions  Regarding  the  Federal
Income Tax  Laws" published  by the  American Law Division of the
Congressional  Research  Service  of  the  Library  of  Congress,
updated January  17, 1980;   that  this publication describes the
tax on "income" identified in the so-called 16th Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution  as an  indirect excise  tax;  that this report
stated:   "The Supreme  Court, in  a decision  written  by  Chief
Justice White,  first noted  that  the  16th  Amendment  did  not
authorize any  new type  of tax,  nor did it repeal or revoke the
tax clauses  of Article  I of  the  United  States  Constitution,
quoted above.";   and this report further stated:  "Therefore, it
can clearly be determined from the decisions of the United States
Supreme Court  that the  income tax is an indirect tax, generally
in the  nature of  an excise  tax ....",  thus proving in my mind
that the  "income tax"  is not a tax on me as a Sovereign natural
born free  State Citizen,  but is, rather, an indirect excise tax
as described  by the  U.S. Supreme  Court in the case of Flint vs
Stone Tracy  Co., 220  U.S. 107  (1911), wherein  the high  Court
defined excise  taxes as  "... taxes  laid upon  the manufacture,
sale, or  consumption of  commodities within  the  country,  upon
licenses  to  pursue  certain  occupations,  and  upon  corporate
privileges ....",  none of  which aforesaid classifications apply
to me.  And further,

     15.  That  I   was  unaware  of  the  truth  of  the  rarely
publicized statement  by the  IRS that the "income" tax system is
based upon "voluntary compliance with the law and self-assessment


                        Page F - 9 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


of tax";   that  I was  unaware before  June of  1990 of a posted
notice  in  the  main  lobby  of  the  Federal  Building  in  San
Francisco, California,  outside the  offices of  the  IRS,  which
notice reads,  in pertinent  part, "The  purpose of  the Internal
Revenue Service  is to  ... encourage  and  achieve  the  highest
degree of  voluntary compliance  in accordance  with the tax laws
and regulations.";   that  I was unaware before June of 1990 that
Mr. Roger  M. Olsen,  Assistant Attorney  General, Tax  Division,
Department of  Justice,  Washington,  D.C.,  made  the  following
statement to  an assemblage  of tax  lawyers on May 9, 1987:  "We
encourage voluntary  compliance by scaring the heck out of you.";
that it  has never  been either  my intention  nor my  desire  to
voluntarily self-assess an excise tax upon myself, nor to give up
my right  to property,  nor to voluntarily subject myself to such
an excise  tax;   that I  had always  thought that compliance was
required by law.  And further,

     16.  That I have examined Sections 871 thru 878, 1441, 1442,
1443, 3401(c),  6001, 6011, 6012(a), 6331(a), 7203, 7205 and 7343
of the  IRC (Title  26, U.S.C.),  and I am entirely convinced and
completely satisfied  that I am not now, nor was I ever, any such
"person" or  individual referred  to  by  these  sections.    And
further,

     17.  That,  after  careful  study  of  the  IRC,  and  after
consultations on  the  provisions  of  that  Code  with  informed
lawyers,  tax   accountants  and  tax  preparers  concerning  the
provisions of  the IRC,  I have  never found  or been  shown  any
sections of  the IRC  that imposed  any requirement  on me  as  a
Sovereign  natural  born  free  State  Citizen  and  unprivileged
inhabitant, living  and working within a County within a State of
the Union,  to file  a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return" or any other
State income  tax form,  or that imposed a requirement upon me to
pay a  tax on  "income", or  that would  classify me as a "person
liable", as  a "person  made liable",  or as  a "taxpayer" as the
term "taxpayer"  is defined  in 26  U.S.C.  Section  7701(a)(14),
which states:   "The  term 'taxpayer' means any person subject to
any internal revenue tax."  And further,

     18.  That, after  the study  and consultations  mentioned in
paragraph 17,  the only  mention of any possible requirement upon
me, as  an individual,  to pay  a tax  on "income",  that I could
find, or  was shown  in 26  U.S.C., was the title of Part I under
Subtitle A,  Chapter 1, Subchapter A (which is deceptively titled
"Tax on  Individuals") and  Section 6012(a),  Subtitle F, Chapter
61-A, Part  II-B, Subpart  B, and  the California  Tax  Statutes;
that a  careful study  and earnest  examination of these parts of
the IRC  revealed that  the "individuals"  to whom these sections
refer are,  in fact, either individuals who work within a foreign
nation like  France and  are taxed  according to a tax treaty, or
they are  nonresident aliens  who receive  income which is either
effectively connected  with the  conduct of  a trade  or business
within the  corporate jurisdiction  of the  "United  States",  or
derived from  sources within  the corporate  jurisdiction of  the


                        Page F - 10 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


"United States",  although not  effectively  connected  with  the
conduct of trade or business within the corporate jurisdiction of
the "United  States", according  to Sections  871 and  872 of the
IRC;   and that,  to the  best of  my  knowledge,  I  have  never
conducted any trade or business within the corporate jurisdiction
of the  "United States",  nor have  I ever  derived  income  from
sources within the corporate jurisdiction of the "United States".
And further,

     19.  That, after  the study  and consultations  mentioned in
paragraph 17  above, my  attention was called to the IRC, Chapter
21,  entitled   "Federal  Insurance  Contributions  Act"  (Social
Security), and  my attention  was also  called to Subchapter A of
Chapter 21  entitled "Tax  on Employees",  which includes Section
3101, wherein  the Social  Security tax is identified as a tax on
"income", not  as an  "Insurance Contribution",  not as a "Tax on
Employees", and  not as  a tax  on wages  or earnings;   that  my
attention was  further called  to  these  facts:    there  is  no
provision in  the IRC  that  imposes  the  tax  on  employees  or
requires them to pay the tax;  a voluntarily signed and completed
Form W-4,  "Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate", allows
an employer  to withhold  money from  a worker's  pay for  Social
Security "income" tax, even though the worker has claimed on that
form to  be "exempt"  from the  graduated "income"  tax;   and an
employer has  no authority  to withhold money from a worker's pay
for the  Social Security "income" tax, for the graduated "income"
tax, nor  for any  IRS-imposed penalty or assessment, if there is
no voluntarily  signed "Form  W-4" in force and no "Form 2678" in
force Granting Power of Attorney.  And further,

     20.  That, after  the study  and consultations  described in
paragraph 17  above, my  attention was called to Section 61(a) of
the IRC,  which lists  items that are sources of "income", and to
the following facts:  that IRS Collections Summons Form 6638 (12-
82) confirms  that these  items are  sources,  not  "income",  by
stating  that   the  following  items  are  "sources":    "wages,
salaries, tips,  fees, commissions,  interest, rents,  royalties,
alimony, state  or local  tax refunds, pensions, business income,
gains from  dealings in property, and any other compensations for
services (including  receipt of  property  other  than  money).";
that sources  are not  "income", but  sources become  "income" if
they are entered as "income" on a signed "Form 1040", because the
signer affirms,  under penalty  of perjury  (within  the  "United
States"), that  the items  entered in the "income" section of the
"Form 1040"  are "income"  to the  signer;   that  Section  61(b)
clearly indicates  which sections  of the  IRC identify  and list
items that  are included  in "income"  by stating:    "For  items
specifically included  in gross  income, see Part II (sec. 71 and
following)".  And further,

     21.  That my  attention was  then called to the said Part II
entitled: "Items  Specifically Included in Gross Income";  that I
studied sections  71 thru  87 and  noticed that  wages, salaries,
commissions,  tips,   interest,   dividends,   pensions,   rents,


                        Page F - 11 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


royalties, etc.,  are not listed as being included in "income" in
those Sections  of the  IRC;   and that, in fact, those items are
not mentioned  anywhere in  any of these sections of the IRC. And
further,

     22.  That, after further diligent study, it appears entirely
clear to  me that  the only way that property received by me as a
Sovereign natural  born free  State Citizen,  living and  working
within the  States of  the Union, in the form of wages, salaries,
commissions, tips,  interest, dividends,  rents, royalties and/or
pensions could  be, or  could have  been legally considered to be
"income", is  if I  voluntarily completed and signed a "Form 1040
Income Tax  Return", thereby  affirming, under penalty of perjury
(within the  "United States"), that the information on such "Form
1040" was  true and  correct, and  that any amounts listed on the
"Form 1040"  in the  "income" block  were "income",  and  thereby
acknowledging under  oath or  affirmation, that  I am,  or was, a
taxpayer subject  to the  tax and  have, or had, a duty to file a
"Form 1040  Income Tax  Return" and/or other IRS forms, documents
and schedules,  none of which instruments I have ever signed with
the understanding  that I  signed them knowingly, voluntarily and
intentionally and  by means  of knowingly  intelligent acts  done
with sufficient  awareness of  all the relevant circumstances and
consequences (see  Brady vs  United States,  397 U.S.  742 at 748
(1970));   and that,  when I  have sent  in State and Federal tax
forms purposely  not signed,  they were  returned to  me  with  a
letter instructing  and stipulating  that I  must sign  the forms
under the  penalty of  perjury, thereby  claiming that  I  was  a
"United States  citizen" due to the wording of the perjury clause
(28 U.S.C. 1746).  And further,

     23.  That, with good faith, with an honest reliance upon the
aforementioned U.S.  Supreme Court rulings and with reliance upon
my constitutionally  protected Natural Common Law Bill of Rights,
Amendments 1  thru 10  (1791), to  lawfully contract, to lawfully
work and to lawfully acquire and possess property, I am convinced
and satisfied  that I  am not  now, nor  was I  ever subject  to,
liable for,  or required  to pay an income/excise tax;  that I am
not now,  nor have  I ever been a "taxpayer", and there has never
been a Judicial Power proceeding in which it was ruled that I was
a "taxpayer"  as that  term is  defined and used in the IRC;  and
that I  have never had any legal duties or obligations whatsoever
to file any "Form 1040" or to make any "income tax return", or to
sign or  submit any  other IRS "individual" forms or documents or
schedules, to  pay any  "individual"  income  tax,  to  keep  any
personal financial records, or to supply any personal information
to the IRS.  And further,

     24.  That the  U.S.  Congress,  the  International  Monetary
Fund, the Federal Reserve Banks and the Internal Revenue Service,
by means  of vague, deceptive and misleading words and statements
in the IRC, in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), in official
statements by  IRS Commissioners  in the Federal Register, in IRS
publications  and   in  IRS-generated  news  articles,  committed


                        Page F - 12 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


constructive  fraud   and  misrepresentation  by  misleading  and
deceiving me,  as well as the general public, into believing that
I was  required to  file "Form 1040 Income Tax Returns" and other
IRS forms,  documents and  schedules and that I was also required
to keep  records, to  supply information and to pay income taxes.
And further,

     25.  That, by  reason of  the  aforementioned  facts,  I  do
hereby exercise  my rights as a Sovereign natural born free State
Citizen, upheld by various court decisions, to rescind, to cancel
and to  render null  and void,  Nunc Pro Tunc, both currently and
retroactively to the time of signing, based upon the constructive
fraud and  misrepresentation perpetrated  upon me  by the Federal
government,  the   U.S.  Congress,   the  IRS,   the  "State   of
California", and  the FTB,  all IRS  and FTB  forms,  statements,
documents, returns, schedules, contracts, licenses, applications,
articles, certificates  and/or commercial  agreements ever signed
and/or submitted  by  me,  or  on  my  behalf  by  third  parties
(including but  not limited to Forms 1040 and attached schedules,
Forms W-2, Forms W-4, and Forms 1099) on the accounts bearing the
account numbers 123-45-6789, and 98-7654321 and all my signatures
on any  and  all  of  the  aforementioned  items,  including  the
original "Social  Security" application, which caused the account
bearing the  account number  123-45-6789 to be established;  that
this notice of rescission is based upon my rights with respect to
constructive fraud  and misrepresentation  as established in, but
not limited  to, the  cases of  Tyler vs  Secretary of State, 184
F.2d 101  (1962) and  also El  Paso  Natural  Gas  Co.  vs  Kysar
Insurance  Co.,   605  Pacific   2d  240  (1979),  which  stated:
"Constructive fraud  as well  as actual fraud may be the basis of
cancellation of an instrument."  And further,

     26.  That I  do hereby declare that I am not and never was a
"taxpayer" as  that term is defined in the IRC, a "person liable"
for any  internal revenue  tax, or  a  "person"  subject  to  the
provisions of  the IRC,  and I  do hereby  declare that I am, and
have always  been, a  "nontaxpayer";  that courts have recognized
and acknowledged  that individuals  can be nontaxpayers, "... for
with them  Congress does  not assume to deal and they are neither
the subject  nor the  object of  revenue laws ....", as stated in
the cases  of Long  vs Rasmussen,  281 F.  236 (1922), De Lima vs
Bidwell, 182  U.S. 176,  179, and  Gerth vs United States, 132 F.
Supp. 894 (1955).  And further,

     27.  That evidence  now available  to  me  proves  that  the
Internal Revenue  Service has  to date  failed to comply with the
clear  and   unambiguous  requirements  imposed  on  all  federal
government agencies  by the following Congressional statutes: the
Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), the Administrative
Procedures  Act  (5  U.S.C.  551  et  seq.),  and  the  Paperwork
Reduction Act  (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);  that the IRS failure to
comply  with  the  requirements  of  these  statutes  constitutes
further constructive  fraud, breach  of fiduciary  trust  between
Sovereign State  Citizens and  public servants, and violations of


                        Page F - 13 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


the  solemn  oaths  of  office  required  of  federal  government
officials, thereby relieving me of any and all legal duties which
could or  might otherwise  exist for  me  to  file  any  returns,
schedules, or  other documents  with the  IRS;   and that,  after
having read  these three  statutes and  summaries of related case
law, I thereby conclude that there is no reason why the IRS would
be exempt  from any  of the  clear and  unambiguous  requirements
imposed upon federal government agencies by these three statutes,
notwithstanding any  and all  allegations to  the  contrary  that
heretofore may  have been  published by  the IRS  or the Treasury
Department in the Federal Register without also citing the proper
legal authorities, if any, for such allegations.  And further,

     28.  That recent  diligent studies  have convinced me of the
above, and  that as  such I am not "subject to" the territorially
limited "exclusive  legislation" nor  to the foreign jurisdiction
mandated for  the District of Columbia, federal enclaves, federal
territories, and  federal possessions  by Article  1, Section  8,
Clauses 17  and 18 and Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S.
Constitution, including its "internal" governmental organizations
therein (hereinafter  referred to  as  the  "Federal  Legislative
Democracy" and  elsewhere referred  to in  this Affidavit  as the
"corporate jurisdiction  of the  United States");   that I am not
"subject to"  this foreign  jurisdiction by  reason of  any valid
contract or any  valid commercial agreement resulting in adhesion
thereto across America, nor are millions of other Sovereign State
Citizens, unless they have provided "waivers of rights guaranteed
by the  Constitution" by  means of  "knowingly intelligent acts",
such  as   contracts   or   commercial   agreements   with   such
government(s)  "with   sufficient  awareness   of  the   relevant
circumstances and  likely consequences",  as ruled  by  the  U.S.
Supreme Court in Brady vs. U.S., 397 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970);  and
that I myself have given no such "waivers".  And further,

     29.  That these same diligent studies have also proved to me
that misrepresentation  and a  shrewd and  criminal  constructive
fraud have  been perpetrated  upon Sovereign  State  Citizens  by
government,  under   counterfeit  "color  of  law",  through  the
apparent   entrapments    of   "certain    activities   (monopoly
occupations)  and   privileges  (other   benefits)"  allowed   by
statutory acts  or otherwise;   that,  by reason  of American Law
which has  never been  repealed, such sources of past and present
criminal element  in and  behind government  should be brought to
justice in  a Constitutional Court of Law for aiding and abetting
this  misrepresentation   and  constructive   fraud  as   willing
accomplices;   that it is for such a Court, with a 12-member jury
of peers,  to decide who is and who is not guilty among personnel
of government,  media, schools,  lawyers, accountants, clergy and
other purveyors  of misinformation and other mind-set propaganda,
in this and related regards.  And further,

     30.  That, due to such shrewd entrapments over many years, I
have unwittingly  signed many  related documents,  contracts  and
commercial  agreements,  some  even  under  the  "perjury"  jurat


                        Page F - 14 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


(within the  "United States")  as was  supposedly required;  with
American Law  on my side, I hereby rescind and cancel any and all
such signatures  and render  them null  and void,  nunc pro tunc,
except for  those which  I may choose to have considered as being
under "TDC"  (Threat, Duress  and/or Coercion), past and present;
that this  is also  my lawful  notice that all such signatures of
mine  in  the  future  on  instruments  of  government  or  other
entities,  including  banks,  which  might  otherwise  result  in
contract adhesion,  are to  be considered  as being  under "TDC",
whether appearing therewith or otherwise;  that my Constitutional
"Privileges and  Immunities" (per Article 4, Section 2) are apart
from those  mandated for  the Federal  Legislative  Democracy  by
Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 17 and 18 and by Article 4, Section
3, Clause  2, and shall not by Law be violated ever;  and that my
status, in  accord, is  stated for  all to see and know in 2:1:5,
1:2:3, 4:2:1  and 3:2:1 of the Constitution for the united States
of America.  And further,

     31.  That,  with  this  accurate  knowledge  and  with  "the
supreme Law of the Land" (Article 6, Section 2) again on my side,
I do  Lawfully and "squarely challenge" the fraudulent, usurping,
octopus-like authority  and jurisdiction cited above in paragraph
28, which  authority and  jurisdiction do  not apply  to me  (see
Hagans vs.  Lavine, 415  U.S. 528 at 533);  it is, therefore, now
mandatory for  any personnel of the Federal Legislative Democracy
or its  agents to FIRST PROVE its "jurisdiction", if any, over me
before any  further procedures  can take  place in my regard, per
Title  5,   United  States  Code,  "Government  Organization  and
Employees", Section 556(d), specifically by disclosing in writing
any and  all contracts or other commercial agreements whereby the
Federal Legislative  Democracy  and  its  agents  claim  to  have
obtained  controlling  interest  in  me  such  that  my  specific
performance  to  any  third  party  debt  or  obligation  can  be
compelled;   OR ELSE  any of  its personnel  and accomplices  who
willfully violate  this  statute  can  and  shall  be  personally
charged as  citizens under Title 18, United States Criminal Code,
Sections 241,  242, 1001  and/or otherwise;  and, in fairness, it
must be  added that,  to my knowledge, IRS agents have NO written
lawful "Delegation  of Authority"  within the  50 States  of  the
Union and  their so-called  "Form 1040" appears to be a bogus and
bootleg document on its face.  And further,

     32.  That, with  all of  the above  in mind, it appears that
this Sovereign  natural born  free State  Citizen is,  by Law, as
"foreign" and  as much  a NONRESIDENT  ALIEN with  respect to the
Federal Legislative  Democracy as he is to France, and thus shall
be free to use related Forms of the Federal Legislative Democracy
if and  when they might be needed, required and/or appropriate at
various future  times  and  places  yet  to  be  determined  (see
paragraphs 12,  13 and  18 above),  including but  not limited to
Form W-8  ("Certificate of Foreign Status") or its equivalent for
banks and/or  other financial institutions, Forms 1040X ("Amended
U.S. Individual Income Tax Return") and 1040NR ("U.S. Nonresident
Alien Income  Tax Return")  for refunds  and for  correcting  the


                        Page F - 15 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


administrative record,  and IRC  Section 3402(n) which authorizes
certificates of exemption from withholding.  And further,

     33.  That, since  my date  of birth on June 21, 1948, I have
always been  a NONRESIDENT  ALIEN with  respect  to  the  Federal
Legislative  Democracy  of  the  "United  States",  never  having
resided, worked,  nor having  any  income,  to  the  best  of  my
recollection, from  any sources  within the District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico,  Virgin  Islands,  Guam,  American  Samoa,  Northern
Mariana Islands,  the Trust  Territory of  the Pacific Islands or
any other  territory or  possession within  the "United  States",
which entity  obtains its  exclusive  legislative  authority  and
jurisdiction from  Article 1,  Section 8,  Clauses 17  and 18 and
Article 4,  Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution;  that I
have  always   been  a   non-taxpayer  outside   the  venue   and
jurisdiction of  Title 26, United States Code;  that, to the best
of my knowledge, I have never had any "U.S. trade or business" as
defined in  Title 26, in 26 C.F.R. or in 27 C.F.R.;  that, to the
best of  my knowledge,  I have  never had any "gross income" from
any U.S.  sources, as  the term  "gross income"  is defined in 26
U.S.C. 872(a).  And further,

     34.  That my  use of  IRS Forms  1040X and  1040NR shall  be
presumed to  mean that  they were  filed solely  to  correct  the
administrative record  permanently,  retroactively  to  June  21,
1948, so as to claim any lawful refunds that may be due, to rebut
any  erroneous   presumptions  and/or   terminate  any  erroneous
elections of  U.S. "residence" which may have been established in
error by  the filing  of any prior IRS forms, schedules and other
statements by  mistakes resulting  in part  from the demonstrable
vagueness that is evident in Title 26 and its regulations, and by
mistakes  resulting   also  from   the  constructive   fraud  and
misrepresentation mentioned  throughout this  Affidavit;   that I
was neither  born nor  naturalized in the "United States", I have
never been  subject to  its jurisdiction, and I have never been a
"United States  citizen" as  defined in 26 C.F.R. 1.1-1(c) and as
defined in the so-called 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
And further,

     35.  That  I   am  not  now,  nor  have  I  ever  knowingly,
intentionally and  voluntarily, with  informed  consent,  entered
into  any   personal,  internal,  public  or  private  agreement,
contract, stipulation,  account or  similar contrivance  with the
"United States",  the "Federal  Government" or  the "District  of
Columbia",  its  territories,  its  agencies  or  other  property
appurtenant thereto,  which would  have altered  or waived  my de
jure, Sui  Juris status,  or  my  unalienable  God-given  natural
rights;   that any  such agreements  or contracts,  expressed  or
implied, such  as a  Social Security  number and  application, or
Driver's License,  or Bank  Signature Card, or the use of Federal
Reserve Notes  (which are  not lawful Specie) etc., have all been
hereby rescinded  ab initio, due to the fraudulent withholding of
material facts, which became a snare and a trap and, as such, are
a Bill  of Attainder  on this  Sovereign natural  born free State


                        Page F - 16 of 18

                                                       Appendix F


Citizen and  inhabitant in  the united  States of  America, for I
cannot become  a nexus  by the  effect  of  a  fraudulent  nexum,
because  my   status  and  unalienable  natural  rights  are  not
negotiable, and  the government,  both State and Federal, has not
proved that  they ever  had jurisdiction  to change my status, as
required by  Title 5 U.S.C. Section 556(d), or as defined and set
out as a Constitutional requirement in Hagans vs Lavine, 415 U.S.
528, 533  (see also  Brady vs  United States, 397 U.S. 742 at 748
(1970));   that any  change of status would lawfully have to take
place in  a Common  Law (judicial  power)  court  under  the  due
process clause  of the  5th Amendment  to the  U.S. Constitution.
And further,

     36.  That this  is to  certify that  I, John  Q. Doe,  am  a
Sovereign natural  born free  State Citizen and inhabitant in the
united States  of America,  domiciled in the California Republic,
living and  working in Marin County, living under the Common Law,
having assumed,  among the  powers of the Earth, the Separate and
Equal Station  to which  the Laws  of  Nature  and  Nature's  God
entitles me,  in order  to secure  the Blessings  of  Liberty  to
Myself  and   my  Posterity,  and  in  order  to  re-acquire  the
Birthright that  was taken from me by fraud, do hereby asseverate
nunc pro  tunc and  rescind, ab  initio, all  feudatory contracts
with the  Federal government  and  its  agencies,  and  with  the
corporate State  of California  and its agencies;  for I, John Q.
Doe, being of sound mind and body, do not choose, nor have I ever
chosen, to  give up,  relinquish or  otherwise waive  any  of  my
God-given, natural, fundamental, Constitutionally secured rights.
And further,

     37.  That my use of the phrase "WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF
ALL MY  RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)" above
my signature  on this  document indicates:    that  I  explicitly
reject any  and all  benefits of  the  Uniform  Commercial  Code,
absent a  valid commercial  agreement which  is in  force and  to
which I  am a party, and cite its provisions herein only to serve
notice upon  ALL agencies  of government,  whether international,
national, state  or local,  that they, and not I, are subject to,
and bound by, all of its provisions, whether cited herein or not;
that my explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon ALL
agencies of  government of  the "Remedy" they must provide for me
under Article  1, Section  207 of  the Uniform  Commercial  Code,
whereby I  have explicitly reserved my Common Law right not to be
compelled to  perform under any contract or commercial agreement,
that  I   have  not  entered  into  knowingly,  voluntarily,  and
intentionally;  that my explicit reservation of rights has served
notice upon  ALL agencies of government that they are ALL limited
to proceeding  against me only in harmony with the Common Law and
that I  do not, and will not accept the liability associated with
the "compelled"  benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreements;
and that  my valid  reservation of  rights has  preserved all  my
rights and  prevented the  loss of any such rights by application
of the concepts of waiver or estoppel.  And further,



                        Page F - 17 of 18

                                                The Federal Zone:


     38.  That I  reserve my  unalienable  right  to  amend  this
Affidavit at  times and  places of  my own choosing, according as
new facts  and revelations  are made  available to  me at various
future times  and places  as  yet  unknown,  and  as  yet  to  be
determined, given  the massive  fiscal fraud  which has  now been
sufficiently revealed  to me  by  means  of  material  and  other
reliable   evidence    which   constitutes    satisfactory    and
incontrovertible proof  of the  fraud to  which I  refer in  this
paragraph and elsewhere in this Affidavit.  And further,

     39.  That I  affirm, under  penalty of  perjury,  under  the
Common Law  of America,  without the  "United States",  that  the
foregoing is true and correct, to the best of my knowledge;  and

Further This Affiant saith not.

Subscribed and  affirmed to  Nunc Pro  Tunc on  the  date  of  my
majority, which day was June 21, 1969.

Subscribed, sealed and affirmed to this  ________________  day of

___________________________, 1993.

I now  affix my  own signature  to all  of the above affirmations
WITH EXPLICIT  RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE
UCC 1-207:


_________________________________________________________________
John Q.  Doe, State Citizen and Principal, by special Appearance,
in  Propria  Persona,  proceeding  Sui  Juris,  with  Assistance,
Special, with  explicit reservation  of all my unalienable rights
and without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

                           John Q. Doe
                    c/o Post Office Box [##]
                 San Rafael, California Republic
                                
Acknowledgement

CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC       )
                                )   Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                    )

     On this  ______ day of ______________________________, 1993,
John Q.  Doe did  personally appear before me, and is known to be
the one described in, and who executed, the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged  that he  executed the  same as his free act and
deed as  a Sovereign State Citizen in this above named said State
of the  Union.  Purpose of notary is for identification only, and
not for entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.

                            _____________________________________
                            Notary Public


                        Page F - 18 of 18
